The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Deryck C. 19:46, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Public Test Realm → World of Warcraft#Realms  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target, though the term is not exclusive to WoW. Other video games, including non-notable ones, have used the term in regards to public beta testing versions of their titles before an update or a release. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 21:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:18, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Circle of eath → Round-robin tournament#Circle of death  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, title is a typo for Circle of death, and a disambiguation page with that title already exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John a s (talk • contribs) 19:50, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I assumed this would be a typo for "Circle of Earth" (not that we have a page by that title). Thryduulf (talk) 00:47, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Unopposed ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:19, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Beano → Template:Infobox character  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Has only 1 maintenance link (database report for unused redirects...). Not a plausible link to a character article, as "beano" can mean a lot of things, including a comic (and not the characters). Gonnym (talk) 19:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Deryck C. 19:48, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Charmed group → Template:Infobox character  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a really plausible template name. Has 4 non-main-space links - 3 are maintenance links and 1 a talk page from 2006. Gonnym (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:00, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Mozambaquie → Mozambique  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is not a common typo. There have been only 31 pageviews in the last year compared to this redirect's target which received over 1,000,000 views. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Implausible misspelling. Any reader who's got as far as typing 'Mozamb' into the search box will have found a link to what they're looking for. Narky Blert (talk) 22:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The search box is only one of many ways people use to search and browse Wikipedia, most of which do not have auto-completion or other suggestions, so the typo appearing only in the later part of the word is not at all relevant. However, I can only find a single instance of this spelling that didn't originate with this redirect which is in the comments section of a video which has no apparent connection to the country. Thryduulf (talk) 00:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:56, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• List of active separtest movments → Lists of active separatist movements  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is not a very useful redirect. There isn't just one typo, there are multiple typos which makes this a useless redirect and there have only been six pageviews in the last year. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delte pr nm. Steel1943 (talk) 18:49, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Dlete per abvoe. Narky Blert (talk) 22:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:59, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Happybihday → Happy Birthday  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A seriously implausible triple misspelling. Delete. Narky Blert (talk) 16:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as implausible; as far as I can tell, it isn't used anywhere. ComplexRational (talk) 22:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as implausible. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 03:45, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Deryck C. 19:49, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• ArticleFirst → OCLC  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Does not appear in target article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:59, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• 2018 CAF Super Cup (disambiguation) → 2019 CAF Super Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

2018 CAF Super Cup no longer a disambiguation page and nothing to disambiguation. Maybe G6 or G14 Hhkohh (talk) 13:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I'd say WP:G6. Narky Blert (talk) 16:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:G14 - nothing at that title to disambiguate. ComplexRational (talk) 22:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Useful when created, but no longer needed. Matches were scheduled for Feb 2018, Dec 2018 and Aug 2019. As the middle match was moved to Feb 2019, "2018 CAF Super Cup" is now unambiguous. Certes (talk) 18:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Deryck C. 19:50, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Code hygiene → Program optimization  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The redirect target program optimization does not mention the term "code hygiene" at all. Code hygiene is more about maintainability (in the sense of code smell or technical debt) than algorithmic efficiency, I think. Tea2min (talk) 08:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tooltip → Template:Abbr  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I propose that redirect should be re-targeted to Template:Hover title as a tool-tip is more like Template:Hover title rather than an abbreviation (Template:Abbr). – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 02:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep because retargetting it would break hundreds of transclusions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per previous RfD. This is actually something I plan to work on in the coming months. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.