The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:DuSable Black History Museum and Education Center → DuSable Black History Museum and Education Center  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Fixed from a bad page move; unnecessary redirect that doesn't meet G14 or R2. Iseult ^Δx parlez moi 19:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as bad cross-namespace redirect. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:28, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:01, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Nominator has withdrawn and fixed the redirect themselves. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• DuSable Museum of African American History → [[:(({target))}]]  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Appears to be from a bad page move (now fixed); doesn't fit any CSD criteria. Iseult ^Δx parlez moi 19:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Withdrawn after further contribution research and redirect fixes. Iseult ^Δx parlez moi 19:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sibcestual → Adelphogamy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Neologism I doubt anyone uses. Very unlikely search term. ★Trekker (talk) 17:48, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There is no use in Enwiki, or any Wikt entry. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 14:27, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Failing Flesh → Eric Forrest  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Because of the nature of this page title ("Project: Failing Flesh"), this page is also classified as Wikipedia:Failing Flesh which is confusing. The only links to the page are from User space. I suggest either deletion or removing the colon from the page title so that this doesn't appear to be a cross-namespace redirect. I'll just add that on the target page, Eric Forrest, the term appears several times as "Project Failing Flesh", without a colon. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I think this was a technical workaround. The band's name is Project: Failing Flesh, which leads to the nominated page. Because of the technical limitation, the article about the band was at Project Failing Flesh until it was merged in 2020. - Eureka Lott 14:55, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Project: Failing Flesh is the correct name of the band which had an article for 11 years, so a redirect for that title is highly useful even if it messes with our namespace system. The redirect page explains why "Project:" becomes "Wikipedia:" here, which clears up the confusion for any reader who noticed the change in the first place, and we editors aren't harmed by this type of technical quirk. Glades12 (talk) 21:20, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The band is attested as "Project: Failing Flesh" per [1]. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The page is actually Project:, but this is a MediaWiki thing, that it automatically displays as WP:. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 20:37, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:American Heritage Dictionary representation → Phonetic notation of the American Heritage Dictionary  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect is the result of a page move discussed at MfD here. It was discussed previously at this RfD five years ago. It was kept because of concern about existing links to this project page but the ones that exist now are from archived User or MOS talk pages or from pages that track cross-namespace redirects. Since the MFD, the target page, Phonetic notation of the American Heritage Dictionary, has had several other moves so I think that whatever rationale existed in 2017 is no longer pertinent. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.; the main space an the rest of WP should be kept separated. Veverve (talk) 06:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:49, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Oversight → Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I propose deleting this unlinked-to redirect because it gives the impression that Oversight can be as easily requested as right such as AutoWikiBrowser (Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser). NotReallySoroka (talk) 06:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep anyone following the redirect to the target will understand how difficult it is to request the Oversight permission. feminist (talk) 08:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Helpful, as it does legitimately point people to how they can get oversight permissions. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep CU/OS are on Template:Requests for permissions, just like EFM and IntAdmin are, which are also more difficult to obtain than AWB. Also it directly points to the page describing how it is harder to get (only given by ArbCom). Happy Editing--IAmChaos 20:33, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Paengi → Flammulina filiformis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Target says "in Korean, it is called paengi beoseot (팽이버섯) which means "mushroom planted near catalpa". Paengi doesn't appear to be a stand alone term for the mushroom. Wiktionary has paeng'i as a term for a spinning toy top. Plantdrew (talk) 03:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as partial title match --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.