April 1

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 1, 2024.

Hinduism in Bolivia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism is no longer mentioned in the target article because the target section was entirely unsourced and removed. Wikipedia has no information on Hinduism in Bolivia. Binnenstaat (talk) 23:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Horst Schumann (politician)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting Horst Schumann to the Socialist Unity Party of Germany page, where he is never mentioned and to which he has no connection to other than being a party politican, creates confusion for people looking him up. I wanted to actually create the Horst Schumann article and am instead faced with this unnecessary and unhelpful redirect (WP:RDELETE No. 9). The redirect is unprotected, but Horst Schumann (politician, born 1924) is the better title for this specific article IMHO. Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural, not properly tagged.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for redlink Okmrman (talk) 16:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ottoman–Azerbaijani Wars

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TENDENTIOUS and revisionist title created as a result of pov pushing. Azerbaijan(is) were not even a nation nor ethnicity at the time [1] [2] [3] HistoryofIran (talk) 23:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 17:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Russo-Azerbaijani Wars

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TENDENTIOUS and revisionist title created as a result of pov pushing. Azerbaijan(is) were not even a nation nor ethnicity at the time [4] [5] [6] HistoryofIran (talk) 23:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 17:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tree Trunks (Black & White World)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 16#Peppermint Butler (Black & White World). The Black & White World appears for one episode as a gag. It has very little relevance to the franchise as a whole. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom + how I voted in the linked discussion. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 01:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 02:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Princess Bubblegum (Black & White World)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 16#Peppermint Butler (Black & White World). The Black & White World appears for one episode as a gag. It has very little relevance to the franchise as a whole. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 02:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom + how I voted in the linked discussion. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Lich (Black & White World)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 16#Peppermint Butler (Black & White World). The Black & White World appears for one episode as a gag. It has very little relevance to the franchise as a whole. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 02:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom + how I voted in the linked discussion. Deja vu. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 13:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Genociding

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. WP:SNOW keep as a standard verb redirect, there doesn't seem to be a reason to force it to continue much longer. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 10:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary suffix Okmrman (talk) 21:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Redirects with trailing.

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9#Redirects with trailing.

List of Barbie: Dreamtopia episodes

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#List of Barbie: Dreamtopia episodes

Barbie: Dreamtopia (season 1)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This title was created by a banned user for a supposed season for the target indicated, which later turned out to be both a series of shorts and 11-minte series episodes. Half a decade later, this title serves no purpose as it's currently and merely a redundant redirect, so requesting deletion. Intrisit (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 16:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Madhukar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was setindexify. (non-admin closure) Duckmather (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are 36 articles for people whose name includes "Madhukar" and this is not the best target. Delete to encourage an anthroponymy article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Set indexify using the IP's draft. Okmrman (talk) 13:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Natsu (dog)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was a four-sentence article about a YouTuber's pet dog, now redirects to the YouTuber's article, an article which doesn't mention and has never mentioned his dog. Belbury (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 03:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom — The Anome (talk) 08:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Simulated reality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. I have been convinced enough that it should be a new article unrelated to the old one that was at this former spot, so RfD no longer applies here. As suggested, I'll be moving the old article to a different location to preserve the old page history. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 09:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page was successfully merged in 2023 - which I still agree with. However, I think that the redirect that replaced it is still not a good idea. "Simulated reality" is too vague a term to refer solely to the simulation hypothesis. It can refer to virtual reality, augmented reality, live-action role-playing or "Potemkin village" situations where everyone besides one person is an actor. In other words it's overly vague to redirect to where it is going now.

A possibility is to move the page to a holding location to preserve the history and introduce a WP:REDLINK, or move it in favor of a disambiguation page. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 13:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Converting it into a disambiguation page will still preserve the page history; all of the previous article content will remain accessible to anyone who wants it. — The Anome (talk) 08:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is a form of article hijack and is inadvisable. As the essay says, combining the history of two pages with different purposes causes confusion and can be difficult to untangle even if the original article has no redeeming content. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 10:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As a ((R from merge)) the history needs to be kept somewhere. Converting a redirect into a disambiguation page is quite normal, but if it's undesirable in this instance then move it to a different title that unambiguously refers to the target - Simulated reality (hypothesis) perhaps (Simulated reality hypothesis already exists). Thryduulf (talk) 18:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Preservation of the saints

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Preservation of the saints

Loule Cross Country

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Loule Cross Country

Los Bajos, Chile

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Los Bajos, Chile

Particle wave

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This neology, likely invented by Feynman in his characteristically off the cuff fashion, is not used other textbooks. It combines two nouns which, throughout the history of physics, have meant incompatible alternatives. It not a synonym or antonym for "wave-particle duality". On the contrary, "wave-particle duality" is the concept of "duality" not "composition" or "ambiguity". The mere existence of this redirect was cited in Talk:wave particle duality as evidence for the term. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: On the one hand, this is pretty solidly WP:NEO. Except, on the other, I can easily see someone either typing it into the search bar because of Feynman, or simply typing in "particle wave" or "wave particle" into the searchbar specifically to get to this concept, the way one might type Jobs and Wozniak to get to History of Apple Inc. Given the target article discusses the intersection of the two concepts of "wave" and "particle" in a manner that satisfies WP:XY, I'd say let the redirect stand. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 16:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on creating a set index at this title?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rolling around at the speed of sound

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lyric from a Sonic Adventure 2 song that is not mentioned at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unlikely search term. Popcornfud (talk) 00:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The song IS mentioned and discussed in the article-- The theme song for City Escape was composed by Jun Senoue, who first worked on Sonic Adventure 2 after moving to San Francisco... The "Escape From the City" theme was featured as a selectable song in the Sega rhythm game Samba de Amigo: Party Central. The theme also received an Irish remix by the band Hyper Potions in collaboration with Senoue as part of a collaboration between Jacksepticeye and the Sonic social media account on St. Patrick's Day. As for the likeliness of the search term, this is literally the first sung lyric from the song, and has become pretty notable as a phrase associated with Sonic himself. It'd be like saying I wanna be the very best shouldn't redirect to Pokémon Theme. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 01:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I'll reiterate, this is a lyric that is not mentioned at the target article. There's thousands and thousands of songs, with hundreds of lyrics in each (unless it's Tequila), and nearly all (suitably) don't have individual redirects; Wikipedia is not a lyric compository. R from lyrics are for lines in a song to a source that "describes the lyric", which this is not, and so far there does not seem to be a reason why this unmentioned line would defy that. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:58, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 16:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eepy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:eepy. Jay 💬 09:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meme not mentioned at target. If I was searching for "eepy" I would not want content on sleepiness but the meme. Also, "eepy" generally refers to sleepiness in general, not just excessive sleepiness. If kept I suggest a retarget to Sleep, though note also the existence of EepyBird. Rusalkii (talk) 02:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The... lack of existence? That's a redlink. A quick search indicates you meant Eepybird, before revealing that their website actually alternately lists it as both Eepybird and EepyBird... one second, creating a long-overdue redirect. In any case, oppose retarget to Sleep on the grounds that Somnolence IS about sleepiness in general, not just excessive sleepiness. In addition, also oppose retarget to Eepybird on the grounds that someone searching "Eepy" in 2024 is a thousand times more likely to be looking for the meme synonym of sleepy, rather than for a company whose main claim to fame according to its article was dated to 2007. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, thanks for catching the redlink. And yes, on a more careful read agree that somnolence is more appropriate than sleep if kept. Rusalkii (talk) 19:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above Okmrman (talk) 13:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Changing vote to Soft redirect to wikt:eepy Okmrman (talk) 02:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Soft redirect as per Eureka and Okmrman. Good catch! 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 13:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think soft redirect is a good idea. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk 04:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bang and the dirt is gone

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meme not mentioned in page. Section isn't about the meme or even the commercial the meme is from, but a related blog marketing campaign. Note that this is by a user who has created a number of recently-nominated redirects. Rusalkii (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This redirect is a quote from Kitchen Gun, a parody of the Cillit Bang marketing campaign that is mentioned in the Wait no, scratch that, this isn't the Kitchen Gun meme- it's the slogan from this ACTUAL ad for Cillit Bang. Shows how familiar I am with Cillit Bang's advertisements, lol. In any case, what I do find odd is that that section is... honestly rather confused? It's titled as if it's all about the viral marketing controversy, starts out talking about the television ad campaign instead, switches gears and talks about the viral marketing, then switches gears AGAIN to suddenly talk about Kitchen Gun, which is inspired by the television ads, not the blog. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hasya Movies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 16:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hasya Movies or "Hasya" not mentioned at the target article, unclear connection to subject based on article contents, external searches did not show Razesh. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No mention has been added yet to the current target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Thryduulf. Okmrman (talk) 16:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Delete!

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Delete!

Food street

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. While only two !votes explicitly call for deletion, both the nom and the "oppose" !vote make arguments that are also consistent with deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 15:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As noted by the page mover, the term "food street" can be highly ambiguous and exist all over the globe, evidenced from searching "food streets" on Wikipedia. Street food looks like the most suitable term out there, which branches off into Street food of Mumbai, Street food of Chennai, etc, although perhaps there is a difference between this and the multiple food streets, such as Gawalmandi Food Street or VV Puram Food Street, etc. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have added Food Street to the nomination. Steel1943 (talk) 20:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Shhhnotsoloud Okmrman (talk) 02:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bimrad metro station

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Surat Metro stations. (non-admin closure) Duckmather (talk) 16:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Bimrad" is not mentioned at the target article; Bimrad metro is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Unhelpful for people that search this term to end up at a page without relevant content. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on retargeting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Liberal Focus Team

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 15:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Focus team" is never mentioned at the target page, and the sparing mentions of "focus" and "team" are not in context of any sort of Focus Team. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, I've also gone ahead and bundled "Liberal Alliance Focus Team", which has even less mentions of "focus" or "team", i.e. zero mentions in any capacity. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm gonna just comment since I'm the one who created them but the reason i created the redirects is because it is a distinct description used for dozens of candidates fielded by those parties in the 1970s and 80s TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 21:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No mention yet of the terms at the targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

tbf the main problem with that is finding somewhere in the articles to shoehorn in the mention - seeing as those articles cover the bigger picture (not their efforts in local council elections) so there's nowhere to put the sentence of 'during local elections, some Liberal/SDP-Liberal Alliance candidates stood under the banner of the Liberal Focus Team/Liberal Alliance Focus Team' (however, there was somewhere to mention the Liberal Democrat Focus Team in the Liberal Democrats (UK) article) 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talkedits) 22:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kimomo Uwizeye

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Combination of legal last name and last name of persona; never referred to this way anywhere I can find. Rusalkii (talk) 05:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

It's dangerous to go alone! Take this.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. I should probably close this since I already have another discussion relating to this topic. (non-admin closure) Okmrman (talk) 03:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See It's dangerous to go alone! Okmrman (talk) 04:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eddie Yongming WU

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Eddie Yongming WU

7.7

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (talk) 03:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah 7.7 is supposed to be a date but first result would usually be bullet types Okmrman (talk) 03:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

John B. Clark

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#John B. Clark

Wildfires in 2025

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (talk) 03:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is unused and will create an unwanted forward link in the navigation boxes. Right now, due to an article name convention change, the navigation itself, ((Infobox wildfire)), uses the wrong article title for the seasons, which you can see by hovering over the forward link at Wildfires in 2023. But that is going to be fixed.

Alternatively, we just leave things the way they are, let the redirects do their thing, and I already had 2025 wildfire season removed, so we're good. But I thought I'd bring it up for discussion. The problem with this is that by not correcting the navigation template, we have to remember to create a new redirect for [Year] wildfire season every year. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete B3251 (talk) 22:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:CRYSTAL. It's not 2025 yet. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 01:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).