The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Clarabelle Cow fillmography → Clarabelle Cow#Appearances  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete the page due to an extra lowercase letter "l" between the lowercase letters "i" and "m" in the word "filmography". Note that Clarabelle Cow filmography also exists. 176.33.244.31 (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is a ((R from move)) but it was at this title for only 1 minute about half an hour after creation in 2005, so there is no issue with deletion. I can't explain why it was moved to this title though, as it was immediately moved back to the correctly spelled title and not moved somewhere else after that so as best I can tell it was intentional (meaning it isn't eligible for G6 speedy deletion). Regardless of why this exists though, it's not a plausible typo, alternative spelling or search term. Thryduulf (talk) 22:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per Thryduulf. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per nom and Thryduulf. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 04:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Inappropriate misspelling Killarnee (talk) 11:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Killarnee. - Master of Hedgehogs ^{(converse) (hate that hedgehog!)} 13:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Curselax → Snorlax  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not actually mentioned at the target. tried looking it up for sources, found nothing cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 17:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete it's a Snorlax build that works around the move Curse. Not really notable outside PvP Pokemon battles. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per Lenticel. We're not Bulbapedia, but more to the point, we're definitely not Smogon. Anyone actually looking for information on Curselax would go there, not here. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 01:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 13:36, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 14:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Thunderbolts (2025 film) → Thunderbolts (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This was a recently created redirect using the year as part of the disambiguation to bypass the move process of Draft:Thunderbolts (film) to this title, before it was reversed. I tried speedy deleting it though it was suggested to take to RFD given the roundabout moves caused by it. There are no other films referred to as Thunderbolts, so this is unnecessary for the time being. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom -- ZooBlazer 02:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unnecessary disambiguation from an incorrect move. —El Millo (talk) 02:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a harmless ((R from currently unnecessary disambiguation)). The film is scheduled to be released in 2025, so the redirect is not incorrect. Thryduulf (talk) 04:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Thryduulf. I don't think this kind of disambiguation is really hurting things around here, since it's technically correct. Regards, SONIC678 17:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep as a ((R from unnecessary disambiguation)). Not a reason to delete a redirect. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per Thryduulf. However, this can change over time. StaleGuy22 (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Thryduulf. With the currently expected release date in 2025, this will always be a plausible way to search for this film (even if it is delayed, etc). A7V2 (talk) 23:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as incorrectly created and should have been speedy deleted by the creator. - adamstom97 (talk) 06:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I had tried requesting speedy deletion although was told redirects created from a page move do not fall in line with the intended speedy delete criteria and was told to take it to RfD instead. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Harmless and correct as others have already stated above. No need for deletion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Stardew (Purity Ring song) → Womb (album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A (very) obscure song that leads into a relatively obscure album. Ik its mentioned in target but almost 0 chance of the song being notable enough for an article in the near future. Also no need for two disambiguators. (FYI: Stardew redirects to Stardew Valley). JuniperChill (talk) 01:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as completely harmless. It's correct, unambiguous, not in the way of anything, mentioned on the talk page, and an article at this title isn't desired so there is absolutely no reason to delete nor any benefit from doing so. Thryduulf (talk) 01:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Thryduulf. Harmless ((R from song)). - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 02:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as it is a part of the album and per Thryduulf. StaleGuy22 (talk) 19:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: It's a single from the album and mentioned in the lead of the article, and thus is a reasonable search term and a useful redirect. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. I don't think the nominating editor understands that redirects don't only exist for notable topics that could be expanded into articles. Ss112 12:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).