The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

NYMets2000[edit]

Final (1/10/0); ended 17:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC) Originally scheduled to end 16:08, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination[edit]

NYMets2000 (talk · contribs) – I've been there for a great period of one and a half months and an amazing 1,500 edits. nymets2000 (t/c/l) 16:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate[edit]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: WP:RFA, WP:ANI, etc.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: Reverting vandalism.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: No.

General comments[edit]

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.

Discussion[edit]

Support[edit]
Doesn't meet my minimum requirements for an admin candidate on the experience front, but hell, no one else is running anymore. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. As per nom. Malleus Fatuorum 16:23, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Funny. B+ jorgenev 16:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose[edit]
  1. While I agree with Wizardman, I don't think NYMETs has enough experience at this time. In particular NYMET has only made 20 talkspace edits Pi (Talk to me! ) 16:28, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, I'm going to hold this until NYMET answers the questions Pi (Talk to me! ) 16:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Since some time has gone by and only 1 question has been answered, I'm going to reinstate my oppose Pi (Talk to me! ) 16:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Only here for one and a half months with only 1,500 edits. Unfortunately, you're not ready at this time, as you lack the editing experience admins must have (at least six months experience and 4,000 edits). However, in six months to a year, if no problems arise and you keep up the good work you're doing right now, I'd be happy to support you. Good luck. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 16:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. This shows a profound lack of understanding of what it means to be an admin. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 16:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Per misuse of rollback. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 16:49, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose We do like to see more admin-hopefuls go into the reverting vandalism department. Unfortunately, he doesn't have enough experience yet in general and some of his edits can be problematic. (Including inappropriate use of rollback made today [1]) Minima© (talk) 16:52, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Strong oppose. Appalling use of rollback, berating an editor for trying to help you, and you haven't even bothered to answer the questions. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:55, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose per WP:NOTNOW and the above comments by ErikHaugen, Strange Passerby, Minimac, and HJ Mitchell. I strongly suggest a speedy withdrawal per WP:SNOW. Richwales (talk · contribs) 17:01, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8. (edit conflict) Oppose - Per this AIV report, which is for submitting an AFC multiple times. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9. After looking through some diffs, this is exactly the type of person who should not be an admin. Will need at least six months of learning. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:05, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose The user does not meet my requirements. Additionally, the user's answers to the questions are poor. MJ94 (talk) 17:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral[edit]


The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category