The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Nyswimmer[edit]

Final (0/5/1); ended 21:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW - Dylan620 (t • c) 21:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination[edit]

Nyswimmer (talk · contribs) – I think I should be adminstrator because I want to help Wikipedia as much as I can,and I want to revert all vandalism Nyswimmer (talk) 19:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate[edit]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: I plan to get rid of vandalism
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: The Kate Cary page because I added a lot of hyperlinks to the books she wrote
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Yes I was in one,but I dealt with it calmly,and will do so in the future

General comments[edit]

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.

Discussion[edit]

Support[edit]


Oppose[edit]
  1. Oppose - 67 edits and less than two months is far too little to go off of for the community to trust you with administrator tools. Sorry, Sven Manguard Wha? 20:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. On the off-chance that this user is sincere, I must regretfully oppose as "nowhere near ready". DS (talk) 20:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. WP:NOTNOW. In a few months I am sure you'll be golden for adminship. Basket of Puppies 20:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Nowhere near ready.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 20:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose As said above it seems to soon haven't seen any other significant administrative task as well as your answers to the above questions is not setting with me well. wp:notnow Staffwaterboy Critique Me 20:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral[edit]
  1. Moral support: nyswimmer, candidates for admin are usually expected to have a lot more experience. It's not necessarily the number of edits you make; but an administrator is expected to be familiar with a lot of different policies and noticeboards, which is something that comes with a year or two of experience working on wikipedia. It's good that you want to serve the project, but I think it very unlikely that most people will support your request for admin just yet. In the meantime, you can make lots of positive contributions without being an administrator. bobrayner (talk) 20:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category