The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.


Sk8terguy27[edit]

Final (0/2/0); ended 21:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC) - per NOTNOW. Mephistophelian (contact) 21:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination[edit]

Sk8terguy27 (talk · contribs) – Though I have had problems when I first started editing here on Wikipedia I have learned from my mistakes and are more careful in editing to make sure I don't make the same mistakes again. I have 1 time I can think of that I lost my cool as it,was a heat of the moment thing and I have a cool head now and won't get angry easily. I have blogging experience though it is not the same as what Wikipedia is I hope you will consider me for Adminship. Sk8terguy27 (talk) 20:05, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate[edit]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: Making sure that articles aren't vandalized and that user don't get into editing wars and to take proper actions and try to get those involved to not start a editing wars, but to work together to make the article better.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: Tom Rice and SunCruz Aquasino as they took a lot of research and development to be able to create a great article that included hours of research, organizing the information, writing then publishing the article to Wikipedia.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Yes I have on July 2012 I believe I kept a cool head except maybe 1 time that I can remember and I intend to deal with conflicts over editing by keeping my cool and working things out with other editors.

General comments[edit]

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Discussion[edit]

Support[edit]


Oppose[edit]
  1. I try not to oppose editors merely on the basis of edit count, but between the low edit count and low account age, this is just too soon. I would urge you to learn more about NFCC as well, as you appear to have some issues in that regard. Also, note that your nomination is transcluded in the wrong place on the RFA page. Monty845 20:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sorry, but per WP:NOTNOW. Not experienced enough in admin-related areas and the answer to Q1 doesn't really show willingness to work in any admin area. There are plenty of things you can already do to stop pages getting vandalised or help resolve disputes you get into. Also, wouldn't oppose for this alone, but the request was malformatted. - filelakeshoe 20:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Neutral[edit]


The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category