The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

VegetaSaiyan[edit]

Final (0/7/0); ended 01:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW CharlieEchoTango (contact) 01:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination[edit]

VegetaSaiyan (talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER VegetaSaiyan (talk) 00:19, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate[edit]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: Nominating for deletion, protecting pages, getting rid of vandals.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: The ones to the Dragon Ball Z articles.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: One time, when Sarujo said that Mad is on season 2 when it was really on season 1. He said that I needed a reliable source, when actually he didn't have a reliable source. I told my frustration to my older brother, who told me he would "take care" of it. He vandalized the account. I thought that what he did was necessary and made another account to vandalize his account. In the end, I gave him a barnstar for remaining cool. In the future, I decided that I will just give warnings because now I know how to use Twinkle. If I get in an edit war, I will just continually try to prove my point right.

General comments[edit]

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.

Discussion[edit]

Support[edit]


Oppose[edit]
  1. Oppose - I ... made another account to vandalize his account. Self-admitted sockpuppeteer and vandal; enough said. →Στc. 01:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose per Σ. HurricaneFan25 01:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Strong Oppose - per Σ. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Strong Oppose per above--5 albert square (talk) 01:10, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong Oppose WP:NOTNOW + concerns with the block log on sock puppetry --Katarighe (talk) 01:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose This is much too soon after your October block. Spend some time learning to help out. It's great that you wanted to be a hero[1] but the way to be a hero is to learn honest ways to help. Cloveapple (talk) 01:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. No, obviously, sorry. Try again when you have at least several thousand edits under your belt, and significantly more maturity -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral[edit]
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category