If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Britisharchitecturefoundation23))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Britisharchitecturefoundation23[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 01:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Massive self-promotion in article on Marco Casagrande, (re)creation of Casagrande & Rintala , Bird Hangar, Land(e)scape, 60 Minute Man (architecture). The main article was stubbified and others deleted after previous AfD dicussion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Casagrande), but new puppets have emerged to restore the deleted content.

Previous archived RFCU can be found here: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Britisharchitecturefoundation23. -- Petri Krohn 01:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red X Unrelated. However, there are possibly relations between all the account except Britisharchitecturefoundation23. We're looking into it. --Deskana (banana) 01:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, BAF23 is unrelated to the above, who are all geographically related to each other. Nevertheless, I must call the results  Inconclusive, if bordering on  Possible. Mackensen (talk) 01:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with Mackensen. There is likely something going on here, but it's hard to tell exactly what. --Deskana (banana) 01:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Britisharchitecturefoundation23[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 03:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

These users appear to be at the forefront of an astroturfing campaign to promote Marco Casagrande and his firm, Casagrande Labs. They are creating articles that serve no real purpose except as promotion, citing no sources but their own. They have created multiple redirects that are otherwise implausible, such as C-LAB. They have seeded other legitimate articles with links to their own articles, usually without citing a connection to the other article. DarkAudit 03:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add

to this list. Stellatomailing 03:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another newly suspect user in this case is:

This user's only edits have been to contest CSD tags for articles involved in this case. DarkAudit 04:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I would like to add

to this list. Stellatomailing 16:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. Also:
  1. Chipingmei2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  2. Domoto02 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  3. Kennthframpton1 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  4. Kennthframpton (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  5. Rofter (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  6. Stelarg3 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  7. Yvesjairre2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
--jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


More