If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Burgz33))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Burgz33[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 01:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

*DannyBurgz (talk · contribs) (not blocked) Actually, given this edit, this account was probably created to malign Burgz33, as it points to the same myspace page.


 Clerk note: I did a WHOIS on the first IP for each each new first octet (meaning, only did the first one for 68.x.x.x, 69.x.x.x and so on). There's a broad range there, all out of St. Louis. Chances are there's going to be tons of accounts from that area given the range of IP's (and the population of the general area). Kwsn(Ni!) 19:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'd noticed that. It may be necessary to file an abuse report with the ISP if CheckUser results are limiting. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
information Note: Not exactly sure what this request is asking for. --Deskana (talk) 01:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was hoping that maybe a checkuser on the IPs and named accounts might flush out a few more of the "hundreds of accounts" the user claims to have. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
no Declined. I'm not blocking all new accounts I see on those IPs on the hopes that it's Burgz. --Deskana (talk) 10:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't suggesting that all new accounts on those IPs be blocked, just ones that fit Burgz edit patterns. How about at least checking the named accounts to see if they were registered from the same IP? OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweetie, that's fishing, which is in violation of the CU policy. M.(er) 04:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm well aware of the fishing policy; I don't believe that this request qualifies as such. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


More