| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 03:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC) |
eg
- DancingeyesCritics cry "impossible", and throw him in the fringe basket, but this whole issue is tied to the subject of ET visitation, a subject that is becoming increasingly less "fringe" (Hon. Paul Hellyer of Canada, the Vatican, Sen. Kucinich), and the evidence is pointing ever so strongly that ETs' presence is real. That immediately brings forth the question of the technologies used for their inter-stellar travel to reach us, which would obviously defy "known" laws of physics, and certainly point to the use of anti-gravity, free-energy and other devices that have been heretofore labeled "impossible", and "fringe" ideas.
- I-netfreedOmI would like to give a few valid scientific points to this "debate". Let's analyze the definitions of "notability"
The other two accounts listed here, Flyboyqw was created during the AfD and made their first and only edits to the AfD. They admitted to being a secondary account but claimed that they had not used another account in the AfD. Richard.Lalancette was created in 2007 but also made their first edits to this AfD. I am also suspicious of these accounts, but their writing style is different, so they may be unrelated (please feel free to remove these other accounts from this request if you feel this is fishing). Tim Vickers (talk) 03:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Flyboy just confused the terms "sock puppet" with SPA. Please try not to make from this ignorance a bigger deal that it is. I can assure you that I am neither Flyboy nor Dancingeyes. The only association we have is solely spiritual. I-netfreedOm (talk) 07:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)