If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Deucalionite))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Deucalionite[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 15:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Deucalionite (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Elysonius (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Code letter: G
Supporting evidence: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Deucalionite.

Having had a look at the SSP case, I'd say the evidence is fairly convincing and warrants a checkuser. If confirmed this is unethical sockpuppetry, since these accounts have consistently backed each other up on talkpages. Moreschi (talk) 15:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inconclusive on the technical level. The ISPs and geographic locations would support segregated work/home or school/home editing, but if so, there have been no slip-ups over the time frame covered by the current CU database. Thatcher 21:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Close geographic locations? Moreschi (talk) 21:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - IP geolocation is tricky, of course, and different IPs give slightly different locations and distances, but I'd call it a reasonable commuting distance. Thatcher 22:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'd second that. Voice-of-All 02:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, gentlemen. I think that's all. Moreschi (talk) 10:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.