If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Eurovisionman))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


Eurovisionman[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 22:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)



As you understand, verifiability is important. As such, the media response to the manipulation of Youtube and wiki was sourced to a Polish magazine published by edipress.com. As a respected magazine with a large circulation in Poland this is considered to be a reliable source). The statements in question were proven in the article and cannot be considered to be rumours. The comments sourced as per reliable source by BBC host who is well respected as a commentator of eurovision who has been written up in UK newspapers over the past few days were written in a non-POV manner and provide more sources for her performance which came last. As Eurovision is a contest that Isis Gee tried to win her results ( place and critic of performance ) are not given undue weight. The article already went through WP:3O and User:Kevin Murray supported removal unless sourced. This was not completed as User:PrinceGlora and yourself have not responded to my points. In face, although User:Kevin Murray removed the false and unsourced Polish nationality of Isis User:PrinceGlora and yourslef reverted versions that included a unsourced material and false statements about her position in the contest which violated WP:BLP.

I ask Ricky81682 to add to the WP:3O initiated by User:Kevin Murray and stop wasting admin time with entries such as this. Would some other admin like to get involved and settle this again?

Eurovisionman (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Of course, if you look at my work in editing Isis Gee it would be less childish for User:PrinceGloria and other admin who believe her revisions are correct to contribute to the 6 points User:Polishchick99 put on the discussion as per the dispute resolution in progress. Unfortunatly, User:PrinceGloria has spend more time using admin to try to block me and others than to resolve the dispute with facts.

Hopefully when I am proven innocent an non-biased admin can assist with dispute resolution without wasting anyones time

Eurovisionman (talk) 10:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at For Life (Isis Gee song) and at Isis Gee. See also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:PrinceGloria and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive422#User:Eurovisionman and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive421#Isis_Gee_article_being_distorted. Between allegations of "being a man" and "fake tan cyborg", all for a very public figure, it's crucial that a stop be done immediately. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is a false statement, please see my sourced edits from a major polish magazine [1]

The admin above is on one side of an edit war and has been rebuked by other admin on my talk page for calling my sourced edit's vandalism when this is a dispute. Hopefully my request to prove my innocence will work to resolve this issue.

Eurovisionman (talk) 08:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added User:Daveo212 which seems to be a WP:SPA. Also, please review the history of this request as other editors may have disorganized it. Apologies from myself. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ricky, you still haven't added any comment to the dispute resolution on the discussion page if isis gee. It is waiting for you? Reading BLV I think a sourced comment from a music critic famous in eurovision isn't vandalism????? Of course when the check user is done and it proves negative am I allowed to ask for your admin rights to be stripped?????? Wogan4life (talk) 20:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing stopping you from asking for it right now. Head over to WP:AN and create a new listing to ask. FYI, it's WP:BLP that's the relevant issue. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


As you understand, verifiability is important. As such, the media response to the manipulation if Youtube and wiki was sourced to a Polish magazine published by edipress.com. As a respected magazine with a large circulation in Poland this is considered to be a reliable source). The statements in question were proven in the article and cannot be considered to be rumours. The comments sourced as per reliable source by BBC host who is well respected as a commentator of eurovision who has been written up in UK newspapers over the past few days were written in a non-POV manner and provide more sources for her performance which came last. As Eurovision is a contest that Isis Gee tried to win her results ( place and critic of performance ) are not given undue weight. The article already went through WP:3O and User:Kevin Murray supported removal unless sourced. This was not completed as User:PrinceGlora and yourself have not responded to my points. In face, although User:Kevin Murray removed the false and unsourced Polish mnationality of Isis User:PrinceGlora and yourslef reverted versions that included a unsourced material and false statements about her position in the contest which violated WP:BLP.

I ask Ricky81682 to add to the WP:3O initiated by User:Kevin Murray and stop wasting admin time with entries such as this. Would some other admin like to get involved and settle this again?

Eurovisionman (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


More