Kdbuffalo et al.

Kdbuffalo (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Happy Couple2 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Loving day (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Code letter: F.

See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/VacuousPoet (5th). Kdbuffalo (talk · contribs) may be stale, but Happy Couple2 (talk · contribs) was just blocked by JoshuaZ as a sock of Kdbuffalo based on contribs and other evidence. Loving day (talk · contribs) has since appeared and immediately edited Happy Couple2's userpage ([1]). There is a lengthy discussion at User Talk:Happy Couple2 about these blocks, so I wanted to see if checkuser evidence could be helpful. I think it's likely that Loving day is a block-evading sockpuppet of Happy Couple2; if it's possible to check either or both against Kdbuffalo that might be useful as well. MastCell ^Talk 17:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I am looking at this currently, but it will take a little while. Dmcdevit·t 09:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into it. MastCell ^Talk 21:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, Kdbuffalo has a long history of suspected sockpuppetry, such as Vacuous Poet (blocked in 2006) and Kdbuffalo was finally community banned on Jan 8th after Happy Couple showed up? And Loving day showed up after the ban? Thatcher 04:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inconclusive Happy Couple2 seems to be editing from behind a corporate firewall which geolocates to two different cities, while Loving Day edits from a residential ISP in a city where that company has a branch. There are some other accounts which could be related but Deferred a more experienced checkuser. Thatcher 04:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thatcher - I've just re-ran the check here and have a conclusion. Email me for details and info - Alison ^❤ 08:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After consultation, Confirmed that Happy Couple2 (talk · contribs) = True Witness (talk · contribs) = CKOCD (talk · contribs) and the puppetmaster is Ra2007 (talk · contribs). There are some possible sleeper accounts that we will be keeping an eye on. Thatcher 03:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kdbuffalo))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Raisinman (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible sock of Kdbuffalo. One appeared when the other claimed to retire...both use the same lengthy style on talk pages...both edit religious articles from an extremely conservative Christian POV. If Raisinman is a sock, there is already a possible WP:3RR violation at Jesus. KHM03 22:24, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raisinman also manages his talk page in the same way Ken manages his talk page. i.e. frequent deletions of on topic material. David D. (Talk) 22:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The other hint is that some of his changes redirect to a Christian Wiki that Kdbuffalo has contributed to. Alienus 01:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although it's not reported here, User:Jayjg ran a checkuser, which established that Raisinman was, as suspected, a sockpuppet for Kdbuffalo. Raisinman has now been blocked indefinitely. Just thought I'd post it here, so that another checkuser admin doesn't waste time checking this while unaware that it has already been checked. AnnH ♫ 23:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Alienus 07:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.