If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rws killer))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Rws killer6[edit]

request links: view • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 15:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

This user has numerous sockpuppets, User:Rws killer (who got banned for making repeat teacher attack articles), User:Rws killer2, User:Umm killer, I suspect User:Nku pyrodragon (he was banned for being one of the sockpuppets, but he furiously denies his identity even after he got blocked), and finally User:Rws killer6. Even though he got banned so many times for sockpuppetry, he still is able to make new IDs. I think it is a time to stop this repetitive procedure of blocking these IDs, and we could do that by hardblocking his IP instead. STYROFOAM☭1994TALK 15:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 IP blocked Thatcher 00:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


96.235.179.193[edit]

request links: view • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 21:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  •  Additional information needed—please provide a link to the closed Arbitration case, from which the user was banned, per code letter B. Otherwise, please select a more applicable code letter. Anthøny 12:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delisted, per above. Anthøny 12:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted. Anthøny 20:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am confuzzeled--96.235.179.193 (talk) 23:52, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments to the talk page, please! AGK (talk) 18:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: The accounts and IP are blocked, there seems no need for action here. Thatcher 04:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Durzatwink[edit]

request links: view • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 16:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, if I may add, I had not vandalized Wikipedia in any way--DurzaTwinkTALK 16:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The case for sockpuppetry has been closed as seen here Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Durzatwink. There is no need for a checkuser. Sincerely--DurzaTwinkTALK 17:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I still propose, as I will reopen the case and then use this evidence. contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994TALK 17:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm quite sure that it would be considered harassment if you keep accusing me of sockpuppetry over and over and over again even though it was proven by several admins that I am not.--DurzaTwinkTALK 18:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was not proved, they simply closed it because of the lack of evidence, that's why I'm here: to get more evidence. contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994TALK 18:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es). - Durzatwink (talk · contribs) = Nku pyrodragon (talk · contribs), with a  Likely connection to the others - Alison ❤ 21:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged and blocked. Keilana|Parlez ici 04:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


More