I am requesting an additional viewpoint in relation to this issue. Both involved parties (including myself) disagree as to the title of the article. While I don’t have the right to discuss the other parties reasons, my own reasoning is that Jat is the common name of the topic of discussion and that peripatetic refers to a number of groups that are not necessarily Jats hence I am of the opinion that the article name should be kept as is. Most sources including the Encyclopaedia Iranica article and Aparana Rao’s seminal work which I have referenced also use the term Jat.RuudVanClerk (talk) 12:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
When translating this article to no-wiki, and establishing the first biography articles there, I find some information that I can not fit into the en-wiki results. This article says that 4×110 yds relay was won by UK, with France second. GBR athletics also says this. But, reading about Camille Sabie, I find two sources stating that USA came second in a '440 yard relay'[1][2]. Is there error in GBR Athletics' results page? The relays results in GBR Athletics are a bit odd, as France is written one time, covering two years. Also, this article states that two outside games competitions were held; 100-m sprint, and the 4×100 m relay. I assume that the 4x100 m here equals 4x110y in the results in the en-wiki article. Does this mean that the 4x110y was not a part of the World Games per se? Any thoughs? Ssu (talk) 08:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Should there be a mention of culinary, cultural and scientific aspects of China in the introduction to further reflect the coverage of the country? This was the initial sentence that has led to back-and-forth reverts between multiple users. Note that this sentence may not necessarily be the one added and may be subject to change after the RFC has concluded. SaintsBradley (talk) 23:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An image with caption "Russia Rajput" which according to description shows "cultivators from Rajput caste" was removed on the ground that these people don't belong to the Rajput caste.[3] Shouldn't we include it as the origin section only talk about formation of community from Shudra and tribals and the image is from an authentic book called "people of India" (the only available source containing image of many Hindu communities ? Heba Aisha (talk) 23:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Have the neutrality issues raised in April 2022 been solved? Can the banner on top of the page be removed? Dentren | Talk 05:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The section titled "Currently unranked teams" on this page should be removed.
I have added it back to the page whilst the RfC is being undertaken so that people can see the content proposed for removal.
Gusfriend (talk) 03:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As the other user is failing to respond, I am making use of dispute resolution procedure. My contention is that Awadh is a separate region from Bihar and information on Awadhi Rajputs is not relevant to Bihar and belongs on a separate article. Looking for comments and opinions from other experience editors.RuudVanClerk (talk) 10:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article needs to be updated, at least one doping case is missing: Russia's 4x400 men's team is disqualified, I assume this is because of Denis Alekseyev's doping case. See updated results. Ssu (talk) 08:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that Hospitality Club does not really work anymore. But there hasn't been any official statment, because the creator(s) of the project just abandoned it. So, no one takes care about the portal anymore, since February 2021 the login did not work anymore, and since April 2022 the page is even offline. The service already lost its popularity in the years before, and there is no media coverage anymore. The result is, that there is no undisputed source which we could use for citation. I did add the information that the service is not functional anymore and used the Wayback Machine and some Uptime-Portal for citation, but this was considered as WP:OR. Otherwise the initiation was changed from "is" to "was" but without citation. So the question here is: Is it really WP:OR, and if yes, will we find another way to get more specific about the current situation of the project, or won't we be able to do any updates unless some media will report about this? - Flexman (talk) 14:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Should the height of the image be listed with feet as the primary units, or with meters as the primary units? (The other system of units will be given as secondary.)
Please enter Feet or Meters in the Survey, followed by a brief statement. Please do not respond to other entries in the Survey. Back-and-forth discussion is permitted in the Discussion section; that's what it's for. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Should the article show Pink Floyd as a current band (present tense, current members Gilmour and Mason) or a former band (past tense, former members only)? TSP (talk) 10:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please choose one of the three options, preferably together with a motivation and reliable sources that explicitly support the party's political position.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 21:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Add the tag ((rfc|xxx)) at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with ((rfc)) are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, ((rfc|xxx|yyy)), where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.