- AlexBrownGarcia (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
29 April 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Editor created sock to hide COI issues. ttonyb (talk) 23:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note Per behavioral evidence (take a look at the deleted contribs) I've blocked Alejandro97. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 01:29, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
21 June 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
Contribution history. RattyNana is already blocked but needs to be added to the archives. Note this editor is still creating articles about himself or family. Dougweller (talk) 08:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC) Dougweller (talk) 08:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
30 June 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
This is clearly an editor with some experience, and has the same geographical interests as AlexBrownGarcia. I noted that Category:People from Shelton, Washington is described as "The following list shows some of the noble natives from Shelton, Washington" which although it doesn't prove anything isn't exactly what we want as a description. Dougweller (talk) 07:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I've added an IP who is clearly the same editor. Does this help? Dougweller (talk) 09:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Possible, but there are a few inconsistencies in the technical evidence that are standing out. –MuZemike 08:01, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Blocked after the creation of Alex Brown-Garcia (illusionist) (and another article which was blatant copyvio, both speedied by others). Dougweller (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note Sock was already blocked, but I blocked the IP for a little while per WP:DUCK. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 23:26, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
18 July 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
Contributions. Note that I blocked Cocodogaquabellcat (talk · contribs) two days ago, should he be added to the archives? Can we get a new range block please? Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 08:05, 18 July 2011 (UTC) Dougweller (talk) 08:05, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think he sees this as a game. Dougweller (talk) 14:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The IP's edit at Kamilche, Washington was identical to that of the obvious sock Cocodogaquabellcat (talk · contribs)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- GuyInKamilche blocked and tagged as a DUCK. The IP looks possible, but not certain. However, if anyone else has seen evidence that I haven't then a block on the IP may be justifiable. I am leaving this open, as a checkuser may be able to find sleepers. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:11, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No comment on the IP, but the named account is a
Confirmed match to 'KatCookie' (talk · contribs). TNXMan 15:02, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, since that account is already blocked, there's nothing more to do, unless, as I say, someone can see enough evidence to block the IP, so the case can be closed. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]