Antiquerugs32 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Nazmiyal (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

When the edits by Antiquerugs32 ("I want to create an article of my own, that will show up on search engines, with all these neat pictures that just happen to be from Nazmiyal Antique Rugs; and here are links to Nazmiyal Antique Rugs under all sorts of rugs they sell") began to be questioned, this new account showed up and created a new article with the same ill-shaped content, including unique and distinctive topic headings.

See Defending yourself against claims.

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Likely based on behavioural evidence; both blocked. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:04, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• G329 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Ccolon86 ‎ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Same linkspamming and "referencing" to http://nazmiyalantiquerugs.com as previous two accounts. Article forking at Heriz and Sarouk to avoid detection (both now redirected, but see histories of both for original spam-o-rama forks). Empty Buffer (talk) 14:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User:Ccolon86 has now been blocked for persistent spamming. Empty Buffer (talk) 07:43, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Defending yourself against claims.

 Administrator note Both accounts now blocked and tagged. TNXMan 14:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Antiquerugexpert (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 66.234.227.39 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Om2728 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Antiquerugexpert is currently blocked per WP:ORGNAME, but this is also an obvious sockpuppet of Antiquerugs32 judging by his editing/spamming.

Om2728 claims to be Omri Schwartz, General Manager Of The Nazmiyal Collection [1]

66.234.227.39 claims to be Omri Schwartz [2] and Antiquerugexpert [3] --Ronz (talk) 19:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Defending yourself against claims.

First off I would like to say that I am not spamming. I have spent days and years researching and I do happen to work for Nazmiyal but if the NY Times and so many other sites agree that we are the best source of information then why not place the link to the site? There are so few people in the world the truly know the history and Wiki had no info until we started putting it in. We are the only people who take the time to research and learn and if Ronz has an issue with my information then why not challenge the validity? I am not trying to sell anything - just teach! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Om2728 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• All registered accounts are  Likely, based on similar locations and matching user agents. No comment on the reported IP address. –MuZemike 23:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I  blocked Om2728 (talk · contribs). I am going to leave the IP unblocked seeing as it has not edited in over a month. Nothing really left to do. Marking for closure. Tiptoety ^talk 17:52, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]