Certifiedallergist

Certifiedallergist (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
02 February 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

These may be stale, but are listed here for possible future use:

Identical revertions, helpful assistance and supportive comments by several registered and anonymous single-minded newbies, one of whom has already been fingered as having a COI in this article. Famousdog (talk) 11:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please check out talk page from here onwards for background.

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • This isn't quite right, 99.186.203.1 is confirmed as connected to Devi Nambudripad, but whether or not 99.186.203.1 and Certifiedallergist/Harshcritique/108.0.122.250 are connected is unknown. Although some connection seems quite likely. Randomnonsense (talk) 04:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Thanks for the correction. My memory played a trick on me there and I got the IPs mixed up. I have stricken that part. -- Brangifer (talk) 05:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Nevertheless, this does appear to be a concerted effort by those connected to Devi Nambudripad given the coinciding appearance of Certifiedallergist/Harshcritique/108.0.122.250, 99.186.203.1 and SParish on the article. Randomnonsense (talk) 17:28, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Compliments to you for your clear report.

Given the huge conflict of interest, the edit warring, the sockpuppetry, and substantial concerns regarding core content policies and guidelines such as WP:FRINGE, WP:RS, and WP:MEDRS, any incentive to permit the above accounts to edit Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique in future is virtually non-existent - Wikipedia:General sanctions regarding Pseudoscience are seeming increasingly relevant. Thoughts welcome. WilliamH (talk) 13:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am merely a physician who was interested in reading about Dr. Nambudripad and her new NAET study. When I found out the rampant abuse of neutral point of view and COI on the part of some editors here as regards to Stephen Barrett, I became very upset. Yes I used to edit without logging in and also in a different account as that is the only way it seems to get attention here. No one would listen to my advice. It seems there are in fact other editors here that may understand my points. I am board certified in allergy and immunology and practice in California. Many of my patients have gone to Dr. Nambudripad and came back telling me that they felt better. So that is why I was curious. It is sad that I have to go and search the internet myself just to get a reference to this autism/allergy study that was done as there is no mention of it on wiki. Other articles in wiki use WP:Primary so it seems blatant that three primary references were removed from this article. You can ban me if you wish. It makes no difference to me as I will not be using Wikipedia in the future for my research purposes. Certifiedallergist (talk) 18:38, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
More