FarnuBak (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

26 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

• JamesFenner (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 86.144.85.72 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

This is my first report, so reporting wont be good, but kindly take a good look into it.

Same editing style, and vocabulary. Anons, and James Fenner show up only for one edits whenever discussions are going "stale". Also, note the brackets surrounding entire signature. If anybody initiates such discussions, they will almost definitely give follow up, but doesnt happen here. Sounds like a duck. There was one more anon, but I forgot where I had seen it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ADwight_D._Eisenhower&type=revision&diff=781665263&oldid=781516258

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dwight_D._Eisenhower&diff=780467767

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vietnam_War&diff=773827963

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Roger_Moore#Connery_was_the_longest-serving_Bond —usernamekiran(talk) 12:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• I don't see any evidence of sockpuppetry. Case closed. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]