At first glance User:Jamesyboy2468 looks like a good editor who edits constructively. But article IOS revision history speaks another story. Starting with User:Oilygreasedupcatanus, this user account was created on 13 October 2012 at 1:00 (see [1]) and made it's first vandalism edit on 17 October, 2012 at 1:43 (see [2]) making abusive statements against IOS. Then account User:Pussycat without the cat was created on 25 October, 2012 at 1:43 (see [3]) and then made it's first vandalism edit again on IOS on the same day at 1:50 (see [4]) and was blocked soon after that. After that User:AndroidAwareness was created on 28 November, 2012 at 17:10 (see [5]) and made some vandalism edits very similar to the other accounts by mocking IOS again (see [6], [7] and [8]). Again after a few days, account User:Lolwat42 is created on 6 December, 2012 at 18:11 (see [9]) then vandalizes and trolls round IOS and some other articles before being blocked. Interestingly to make this case more strong and easy Lolwat42 leaves a feedback at the Feedback dashboard by saying "Android is better" (see [10]). As usual after one week of break, User:Lolwat43 is created on 13 December 2012 at 18:11 (see [11]) and as obvious completely vandalizes and disrupt the IOS page (see [12], [13], [14] and [15]). Amazingly major evidence point comes when User:Jamesyboy2468 warned User:Lolwat43 about vandalism on IOS just minutes apart from various vandalism edits which were done during that time. Here comes the turning point, Jamesyboy2468 requests auto-unblock on their talk page on 13 December, 2012 at 18:22 (see [16]) just 6 minutes after Jamesyboy2468 gave last warning to Lolwat43 (see [17]) and 5 minutes after Lolwat43 was blocked at 13 December, 2012 at 18:17 (see [18]). And that is not all, user's continued quest to disrupt and troll didn't come to an end here when the next day account User:Thenoobtuberofall was created on 14 December, 2012 at 16:50 (see [19]) and again vandalized on IOS. Given all the evidence above and very similar abusive behavior on all these accounts clearly suggests that all these are very likely Sockpuppets of each other and the user on one hand operating good hand account on one side and multiple band hand accounts to vandalize, disrupt and troll Wikipedia on another side think it's a game. Therefore a full Checkuser investigation is very much needed here to check out the truth and find out any more hidden sleeper accounts this person might be having. I believe this person is on a Dynamic IP range and there is a high possibility of major socking here. TheGeneralUser (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
-- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 03:42, 16 December 2012 (UTC)