Mamaluigi2

Mamaluigi2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
10 September 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

They seem to have a lot in common - including removing the PNG image from Angry Birds Epic and replacing it with an uncool JPG file. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:55, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


10 September 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

I would not necessarily call this a sock, but it is associated with a blocked user, and performs actions on behalf of him. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:48, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


10 September 2014
Suspected sockpuppets


121.1.18.239 (mentioned above) leads to UserMDI via same edits at Far Eastern University: [20] vs [21]. And also this edit [22] by the IP is the same behavior pattern of inserting that link and associated copyvio/spampromotion in several Philippines-related media articles as UserMDI. DMacks (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the PH-media site being promoted.

It involves a pile of 121.54.44.* and 121.1.18.* IPs. DMacks (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
11 September 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

Identical username and same actions. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:37, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thank whoever identified the sock as guilty, and request this case be closed... Until he ever strikes back. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:24, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
18 September 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

I ran into a few ip editors that all seemed to edit the user pages of previously identified socks to say that they had retired, instead of being blocked. Might be worth checking to see if any new account have been created. Juno (talk) 02:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is worth noting that not every edit by these ips was negative. A few of them actually correctly, or more correctly identified talk pages as belonging to socks of Malusia22. Juno (talk) 02:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, 121.97.139.179 has already been blocked by Kuru, while 203.87.254.27, 203.111.231.129, and 203.111.231.130 have already been blocked by DoRD. Juno (talk) 02:44, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The ip editors also seem to be related to the previous sockmaster Papajeckloy. Juno (talk) 03:08, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Comment: For me, those IPs are not socks of Malusia22, instead they more likely belong to User:Bryancyriel and/or User:Mamaluigi2: a vandal that is obsessed with Angry Birds. This user is known to edit user talk paged and adding the tags he found on User:PapaJeckloy's talk page to unrelated users and IP addresses. -WayKurat (talk) 02:50, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, the kid seems like "stalking" every edit I do. I got involved on blocking Jeckloy and Malusia22 and this kid wanted to be involved into them as well. -WayKurat (talk) 02:53, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmmmmmmmm, interesting. I may very well have pegged this to the wrong sockmaster but it is definitely the same entity and they definitely up to no good. Juno (talk) 03:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
24 September 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

I noticed something similar on 18 September, but fingered the wrong sockmaster. Same activity, likely the same perpetrator. Probably worth looking to make sure and check for any sleepers. Juno (talk) 05:41, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

You could also add:

MandatoryTeaser (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

I'm almost certain this is the same user -

With this sock he's not overtly edit warring yet, and has made innocuous edits elsewhere, but it's the same kid, imo, just too many things in common for it not to be. Begoon talk 06:20, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply @Bish. Yeah - I had to get a couple of Angry Birds pages semi'd at RFPP earlier when he was out to play on proxies. That's all I've really been concerned with, the article space, since the rest is so silly as to be hardly worth a (desired) response, imo. Begoon talk 12:59, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, and, true to form, in the "not attempting to hide" vein, there's this: [32] Begoon talk 14:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
26 September 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

Pretty sure this is the same guy. All 3 of these ips have been blocked for 24 hours by Materialscientist, but I wanted to see them archived here. It might be worth checking for sleepers. Juno (talk) 15:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Materialscientist also rangeblocked 203.111.224.0/20. Sleeper check already done. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 15:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

30 September 2014
Suspected sockpuppets


Usual behaviour:

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


01 October 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

Judging from the edits done by both IP socks, he reverted edits from the talk pages related to Bryancyriel/Mamaluigi2 I previously reverted and posted bogus welcome pages to four new accounts that have no edits on them. The 119.94.247.108 IP also edited the Angry Birds (video game) talk page and he reverted all of the edits of his previously blocked IP socks, reinstating his version that tags the Andrea Brillantes article (1, 2). -WayKurat (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC) WayKurat (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:45, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
08 October 2014
Suspected sockpuppets


Per WP:DUCK. Although this user has not yet begin the "Angry Birds" wrath, the new user has a very striking similarity on how he created his user page. Check this and this one, the latter is User:Raffy Tulfo, a blocked sockpuppet of Mamaluigi2 just days ago. - WayKurat (talk) 16:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
25 October 2014
Suspected sockpuppets


Already checked and blocked. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:12, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
03 November 2014
Suspected sockpuppets


Per WP:DUCK, this IS Mamaluigi2. Just weeks ago, a similarly named sockpuppet account has been reported here in SPI and was subsequently blocked (see User:Laila Chickadora). Also, Laila Chikadora's (no 'c') user page has striking similarities on other blocked Mamaluigi2 socks. - WayKurat (talk) 15:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


08 November 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

Per WP:DUCK, Bryancyriel/Mamaluigi2 starts naming his socks on Filipino catchphrases and now edits TV5 (Philippines) related articles. He started adding Facebook and Twitter links on TV5 shows using 121.96.218.170, then after I removed it, he used a different IP address (212.55.45.185, a proxy IP) reverted back his edits and even "welcoming" the first IP address (a Mamaluigi2 trait). After the proxy IP edits has been reverted, two new accounts (Walang Relasyon and Malintadong Pinoy) popped out and reverted back the links. And after those two have been tagged as Mamaluigi2 socks, this user popped out and added hoax info in the Rovio Entertainment article. After Reaksyon AGAD-AGAD was blocked, two new sockpuppets (I will take the one and DaMack's) reverts back the cuss post added by Reaksyon AGAD-AGAD on my talk page. See 1, 2, 3- WayKurat (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Not to mention that he seems to have degenerated to outright harrassment Malusia-style. Or has he done this sort of tomfoolery before? Blake Gripling (talk) 13:38, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
09 November 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

'Tis a duck based on edits to Rovio Entertainment - what this user did was similar, if not completely the same, as with the recently-blocked Mamaluigi socks' edits on the page. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:47, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Clerk endorsed to confirm all accounts and to weed out any additionally created accounts. A checkuser may also help in determining if a range block is appropriate. Mike V • Talk 21:20, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

12 November 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

Danton's already blocked for vandalism, but as what his editing pattern can attest I'm listing the account here for the record.

Gusto ko maging Walang Kwenta (lit. "I want to be worthless") is pretty much a duck considering Luigi's habit of editing TV5-related articles. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
21 November 2014
Suspected sockpuppets


All of the accounts mentioned above is consistent with Mamaluigi2/Bryancyriel's editing habits: re-add his previously reverted edit on several TV5 show articles, in which he adds the "official" Facebook and Twitter pages of the shows, then adds curse words either directed to me or the previous editor on his edit summary. He's current tactic is to create a new username, edit one article, abandon it and create a new username. -WayKurat (talk) 00:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC) WayKurat (talk) 00:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
21 November 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

Based on a revert that this user did on the Tropa Mo Ko Unli page, though a CheckUser might be needed to further confirm this. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
21 November 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

Making the same revert to Rovio Entertainment as earlier banned socks (eg. [37] [38]). McGeddon (talk) 09:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
25 November 2014
Suspected sockpuppets


The guy is back, with his usual reverts and the cursing on the edit summary. Please check if there are any sleeper accounts as this user creates multiple accounts in one day. - WayKurat (talk) 00:08, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
More