The sock puppetry investigation procedures page covers the procedures for patrolling, clerking and CheckUser work on the Sockpuppet investigations pages.

General notes[edit]

These pages are used to discuss whether a user is likely to have violated Wikipedia's sock puppet policy, or breached other restrictions (e.g. blocks or bans) using multiple accounts or IPs. When reviewing cases, keep in mind that there are legitimate uses of multiple accounts, and that improbable things can happen by chance. Unfairly blocking someone as a sockpuppet is a harm not easily undone.

Patrolling[edit]

Indicators and templates   (v  · e)
These indicators are used by Checkusers, SPI clerks and other patrolling users, to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments.
Case decisions:
 IP blocked  ((IPblock))  Tagged  ((Stagged))
 Blocked but awaiting tags  ((Sblock))  Not possible  ((Impossible))
 Blocked and tagged  ((Blockedandtagged))  Blocked without tags  ((Blockedwithouttags))
 No tags  ((No tags))  Blocked and tagged. Closing.  ((Blockedtaggedclosing))
Information:
 Additional information needed  ((MoreInfo))  Deferred  ((Deferred))
information Note:  ((TakeNote))  In progress  ((Inprogress))
Clerk actions:
 Clerk assistance requested:  ((Clerk Request))  Clerk note:  ((Clerk-Note))
 Delisted  ((Delisted))  Relisted  ((Relisted))
 Clerk declined  ((Decline))  Clerk endorsed  ((Endorse))
Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention  ((Selfendorse)) CheckUser requested  ((CURequest))
Specific to CheckUser:
 Confirmed  ((Confirmed)) Red X Unrelated  ((Unrelated))
 Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es).  ((Confirmed-nc))
 Technically indistinguishable  ((Technically indistinguishable))
 Likely  ((Likely))  Unlikely  ((Unlikely))
 Possible  ((Possible))  Inconclusive  ((Inconclusive))
no Declined  ((Declined)) no Unnecessary  ((Unnecessary))
 Stale (too old)  ((StaleIP)) no No comment  ((Nocomment))
crystal ball CheckUser is not a crystal ball  ((Crystalball)) fish CheckUser is not for fishing  ((Fishing))
 CheckUser is not magic pixie dust  ((Pixiedust)) magic eight ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says:  ((8ball))
 Endorsed by a checkuser  ((Cu-endorsed))  Check declined by a checkuser  ((Cudecline))
 Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely)  ((possilikely))

The following users may do the following:

Any capable user
Any administrator
Trainee clerks
Full clerks
CheckUsers

Process notes[edit]

Process overview for clerks

Please note that only clerks and CheckUsers may endorse or decline CheckUser requests

In broad, cases progress the same whether or not CheckUser is requested. The only difference is that if a case has CheckUser requested, and it is endorsed, then extra evidence will be added to the case.

I. If you think a case merits a CheckUser investigation, on the ((SPI case status)) template, replace the curequest parameter with endorse or, alternatively, add the endorse parameter if no user has requested CheckUser, but you feel one is necessary.

Then, in the "Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments" section, add ((endorse)) or ((decline)), followed by a short explanation as to why you have endorsed or declined a CheckUser request.

II. After a CheckUser commented on the case (if applicable), replace the ((SPI case status)) parameter from endorse to checked. (Most CheckUsers do this for the clerks after a check is completed.)
III. Review the case carefully. At this point, any administrator can make a determination as to whether sock puppetry or similar has occurred and take action if needed.
IV. Tag the user page of the sockpuppet you have just blocked with ((sock|MasterAccount|blocked)) or ((sock|MasterAccount|confirmed)).
V.
  • Once finished, add your notes (using ((clerk-note)) if desired), and replace the ((SPI case status)) parameter to close to mark the case as ready for final clerk review and archiving. It is general practice (with exceptions) to have another clerk review your work when you change the case status. As a rule of thumb, try to keep yourself from changing two case statuses in a row.
  • A key responsibility of Clerks is to review the case before finally archiving, to see if anything else needs doing, if it is really closed, and so on. This helps detect any errors by non-clerks (or clerks), and/or incomplete handling issues. In particular, it is important to check that sockpuppets' userpages are properly tagged. Check for additional evidence or notes added after the case was closed.
  • It is recommended that clerks use this script to help with changing states, and especially archiving.

Advanced clerking

Whilst the procedure above deals with run of the mill clerking of cases, there are cases where clerks need to "tidy up" a case that hasn't been properly filed, or perform some other out of the ordinary action. This section describes the correct procedures to be followed.

Cases filed under the name of the sock

Despite our best efforts in the instructions, many users file cases under the name of the newly discovered sockpuppet, and list the master as a sockpuppet.

In such cases, clerks must switch the case to the correct master. The procedure to be followed is different, depending on whether a prior case has been filed for the true master account;

No case has ever been filed for the account we wish to file the case as
  1. Move the case page to the correct name.
  2. Edit the case at the new name, switching all occurrences of the sock and master names as appropriate.
  3. Edit the redirect at the old name, replacing the redirect with ((SPIarchive notice|newcasename)).
No case is currently active for the account that we wish to file the case as, but a prior case has been filed

See also: WP:HISTMERGE

  1. If you are a non-admin clerk, contact an admin clerk to merge the cases.
  2. If you are an admin clerk, move the case page to the existing case page, leaving a redirect.
  3. When it asks if you want to delete the target page, confirm that you do.
  4. Click on the history of the new page. Click on the link that shows all the deleted revisions. Check all the deleted revisions and click on the Restore button.
  5. In the new information on the new page, correct any occurrences of the sock and master names as appropriate.
  6. Edit the redirect at the old name, replacing the redirect with ((SPIarchive notice|newcasename)).

Cases where sockpuppetry has been found, but the listed master is unrelated

Just move it to the oldest sock in the confirmed list.

Clerk notes[edit]

Clerks are called upon to make procedural notes, along with constructive observations. Some types of notes that clerks are asked to make are:

Closing a request

A case should be closed when there is no further action needed. Examples include requests that have been dealt with by a checkuser, checkuser requests that have been declined by a clerk, and requests in which the involved parties have been blocked or cleared of sockpuppetry.

General notes[edit]

CheckUsers are responsible for the use of the tools they have, and should never use those tools without checking personally that there is good cause.

Templates[edit]

For tagging

For cases