Xayahrainie43

Xayahrainie43 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xayahrainie43/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Xayahrainie43.
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.


02 March 2021

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar edit pattern. Added original research in articles about Maths. Also tested in Sandbox. SCP-2000 06:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Above.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I think the most recent batch of editors blocked for acting like Xayahrainie43, in early February, consisted of 2402:7500:487:A54:950E:CA08:36D:1EFD (talk · contribs) example diff, 114.41.114.70 (talk · contribs) example diff, and 220.132.207.146 (talk · contribs) example diff. In this new case, the pattern of sandbox usage, interest in mathematical topics, and edits adding large numbers of unsourced calculations example diff matches past incidents, enough so that I'd be comfortable classifying this as the same repeat block evader. The specific targeted articles are different, in large part because the previous targets have been semiprotected against this editor. But the Checkusers are unlikely to tell us about matches between named editors and IP addresses. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To which I would add, the behavior after their edits are reverted (systematically reinstating all the same edits without much comment) is also identical to past instances. If we didn't have an open SPI to go through, I'd have blocked them by now. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]