The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:EJBanks[edit]

Suspected sockpuppeteer

EJBanks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

LedgerJoker (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Wryspy 10:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

User:LedgerJoker is creating redundant categories and articles, some of which are awkwardly named and/or inappropriately capitalized for Wikipedia style. Despite the new user name, this user has quickly gone to work creating articles and categories. These behaviors are consistent with the behavior of User:EJBanks, who was permanently banned as a sockpuppet of User:Creepy Crawler and had also been believed by many to be a sockpuppet of a user called Batman fan. Additional signs that LedgerJoker and EJBanks are the same people then lie in their common interests: 1. Hastily populated soap opera categories. 2. Special attention to Days of our Lives. 3. Comic book characters (in this case, Joker in his name). 4. Spider-Man movies. 5. Reality show contestants. 6. Various celebrities. 7. Date-based categories/lists (recently Category:Television in the 2000's).

Wryspy 10:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I havent done much with socks but it looks 95% like a sock Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

User:LedgerJoker is indef blocked as a sockpuppet. Closing. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---