The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
Suspected sockpuppeteer

Neutralhomer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Flatsky (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

JPG-GR (talk) 09:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence
Comments

User:Neutralhomer appears to only use the User:Flatsky account to avoid blocks - no overly abusive actions have been taken by the user, though incivility and improper usage of Twinkle continue. JPG-GR (talk) 10:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Blocked the sock (Flatsky) and reset the current block on Neutralhomer for the evasion. The evidence appears very clear that this these two are socks. Metros (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser requested for confirmation at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Neutralhomer. Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 12:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]