April 12, 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete Circeus
Template:Beastie Boys Albums[edit]
Template:Beastie Boys Albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Butt-ugly, unused, and covered by ((Beastie Boys)). Circeus 16:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Circeus is right. Mike1024 (t/c) 21:33, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Redundant. Chairman S. Talk 22:16, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Redunant --Andy123(talk) 16:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I don't think "butt-ugly" is grounds for deletion, if that were all, I'd say just pretty it up. But redundancy renders this template unecessary and un-useful. KillerChihuahua?!? 11:45, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even though I don't need to say it again: Redundant. Pagrashtak 20:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Shawn 19:30, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Pagrashtak 16:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Template:RuneScapeVertical[edit]
Template:RuneScapeVertical (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete-- unused, completely replaced by Template:RuneScape. J.J.Sagnella 13:48, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete Circeus
Template:Coordinates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
delete -- unused, replaced by ((coor dms)) and ((coor title dms)). --William Allen Simpson 08:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was relisted on correct date (April 18) --William Allen Simpson 04:24, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Was deleted last year under the name Template:Otherusesabout (see log, which is filed under "not deleted" as it was redirected to otheruses1). Was deleted because it opens with "This article is about..." which is (or at least really should be) a repeat of the first line of the article, and so is redundant. ed g2s • talk 23:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. ed g2s • talk 23:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I repeat my previous comment: "Delete. James F. (talk) 11:23, 15 August 2005 (UTC)". James F. (talk) 23:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom —jiy (talk) 23:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This formulation of disambiguation notes has always grated with me. If it's not clear what the article's about from its opening words, it ought to be edited to make it clear, instead of introducing the article with this odd, redundant and self-referential style. The only thing worse than this is all the "Elections in" articles which begin with e.g., "Elections in Sweden gives information on election and election results in Sweden". This has already been through TfD once; let's get rid of it. — Trilobite 15:23, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.