< April 14	April 16 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty^Woohoo! 04:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox NL Town (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WikiProject Newfoundland and Labrador has determined to use "Infobox Settlement" instead of this infobox. As such, there are only two articles that use "Infobox NL Town", while there are dozens of Newfoundland towns that use the "Infobox Settlement" infobox. — Neelix (talk) 22:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Not popular, or necessary. --Bwpach (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant to Infobox Settlement.--Lenticel ^(talk) 21:39, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Migrate the existing transclusions, then delete. --Qyd (talk) 16:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty^Woohoo! 04:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Realtime Worlds games (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A template with only two entries seems unnecessary. — xenocidic (talk) 20:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• It has three and there will be more in the future. It makes it clear to see the games created by this company.Andrew22k (talk) 20:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The navbox that makes up this template can simply be pasted onto the articles (as I've already done). Also, Mobile Forces was not developed by RTW (it was developed by its spiritual predecessor Rage Software - I removed it from the template. xenocidic (talk) 20:47, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A template is not needed for 2 articles. It can be recreated if there is a need for it in the future. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - unnecessary navigation template, these two articles already link to each other anyway. Terraxos (talk) 01:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - if it will be necessary in the future when more games are made, recreate it then. For the meantime it isn't necessary. ><RichardΩ612 07:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty^Woohoo! 10:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yolanda Johnson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Singer and all related articles were deleted via AfD. Template is useless. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 19:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom - useless navigation template between nonexistent articles. Terraxos (talk) 01:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Possibly speedy via CSD T3 or G6, if not then delete via TfD anyway. ><RichardΩ612 07:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty^Woohoo! 10:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GreekUnicode (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

An unused table that's unlikely to be used as a template, Greek alphabet already has enough tables and navigation bars. —- Prince Kassad (talk) 19:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, it was created by a user with the aim of pushing for his own rather idiosyncratic ideas about alphabets, alphabetic orders and historicity of characters. Won't ever be used in articles. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty^Woohoo! 10:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ly to pc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The template is not used nor is it likely ever to be used. You might wish to convert from light-years to kilometres (& miles). With ((convert)) you can. ((Convert)) also allows conversions from parsecs to kilometres. Therefore (because of the way ((convert)) is set up) if ever you need to convert from light-years to parsecs, you can with ((convert)). So redundant & not that useful anyway, delete this one. JЇѦρ 08:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Lightmouse (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--Lenticel ^(talk) 22:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty^Woohoo! 10:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CubicFeetPerSecAndMeters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As with the volumetric flow templates nominated yesterday, this is redundant to ((convert)). This time the cubic foot is abbreviated as "cu ft/s" in accordance with WP:MOSNUM but you can't turn off the link causing overlinking problems if used more than once in an article. The template was being used in river articles, mostly in the infobox. ((Infobox River)) has now been upgraded eliminating much of the need for conversion templates to be put inside it. Besides that, well, there is the rather cumbersome two-dozen-letter camel-case name which doesn't quite make sense (i.e. it's to cubic metres not and metres). JЇѦρ 04:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC) ... It doesn't format numbers either. JЇѦρ 05:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom.--Lenticel ^(talk) 08:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lightmouse (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.