The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was 'delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 07:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pope before 376 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer used. All the uses have been replaced with the succ boxes recommended at Wikipedia:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization. This will make it easier to add other bishoprics held before the papacy. Since all the popes now have a succ box this is no longer needed.. Bazj (talk) 20:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 20:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. This template was established to allow for the succession of popes to the office of Pontius Maximus (and to skip that title prior to 376 - thus the special template for popes before that date). This succession was denied by other editors who undid the template.Student7 (talk) 20:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.
  –Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 23:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom.--S_RX 23:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – inflexible template whose role has been superseded by ((s-start)) (as in other cases). Waltham, The Duke of 07:53, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete - deprecated. --Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 00:56, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NRFA questions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Should have been deleted as part of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:New adminship proposals. The template was for use in Wikipedia:New adminship proposals which was speedy deleted per the author's request. naerii 13:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per nom.--S_RX 23:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Keep - update or merge based on results of discussions on this template's talk page or Template talk:Infobox Television#Vernacular. Refactoring has to do with changing comments on a talk page and is not a meaningful result for a template. --Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 17:15, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox kdrama (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox kdrama/Header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox kdrama/Namebox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox kdrama/Footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I felt the template stupid because it is a consisting of header, simple form of ((Infobox Television)), Korean name and its romanization and footer. Infobox Television can do anything better than kdrama for the TV shows. But if you need Korean name and romanizations displayed then ((Ko-hhrm)) will do something for you. And it was supposed to be "compatible with animanga templates." Now it isn't because animanga templates revamped themselves in May 2008 while Infobox kdrama remains same and can be solved if someone fix ((Infobox animanga/Drama)) to include non-Japanese adaptations. JSH-alive ^(talk)_(cntrbtns)^{(mail me)} 11:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Per WP:MOS-KO, it is preferable to place the Korean name in an appropriate infobox rather than inline, which is presumably why this infobox exists in the first place. It would be nice if a "vernacular" section could be incorporated into ((Infobox Television)), which would be useful for all non-English language TV shows. PC78 (talk) 08:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've started a discussion at Template talk:Infobox Television#Vernacular regarding this proposal. Probably better to resolve this by updating/merging templates, I think. – Luna Santin (talk) 17:37, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Doesn't sound like deleting is the best option. Maybe it needs refactoring to call ((Infobox Television))? I fear some discussion is needed to find a better solution and that TFD is not the right place. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - It sounds fine. :) --Candlewicke (Talk) 03:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox World Heritage Site (Protected area) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is not used anymore, so it should be deleted per criteria #3. Also note that I am the creator of this template.—Chris! _ct 05:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per C3 and authors request. --S_RX 23:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.