The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 12:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Image Gallery (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is not used on any articles, and is rendered superfluous by Template:Gallery. Neelix (talk) 16:21, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unused and redundant. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 16:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not needed any more. ChrisDHDR 17:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - For above reasons stated. BritishWatcher (talk) 18:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 12:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:StargateLists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nearly all of the lists in this templates were merged. Template is orphaned and unused in article space. – sgeureka ^t•c 15:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as orphaned per sg. Eusebeus (talk) 17:08, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No longer needed. BritishWatcher (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stargate Characters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

After the big merger of nn SG articles in summer 2008, the names of the non-merged articles from this navigation template were "merged" into the main Stargate navigation template, where they now take two lines. This template is now orphaned. The character articles and character lists can use the main navigation template just fine. – sgeureka ^t•c 15:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Included in this TfD is the redirect Template:StargateCharacters. – sgeureka ^t•c 15:31, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per sg as orphaned. Eusebeus (talk) 17:08, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Same reasons as before BritishWatcher (talk) 18:55, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:StargateTech (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

After the big merger of nn SG articles in summer 2008, the names of the 6 non-merged articles from this navigation template were "merged" into the main Stargate navigation template, where they now takes up a line. This template is orphaned, and it it is unlikely to become useful again, even as a redirect. – sgeureka ^t•c 15:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - For same reason as above and all other redundant Stargate templates(seems to be a lot of them).BritishWatcher (talk) 18:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as redundant.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stargate Races (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

After the big merger of nn SG articles in summer 2008, the names of the non-merged articles from this navigation template were "merged" into the main Stargate navigation template, where they now takes up a line. I don't know if this nom violates GFDL, but this template is orphaned, and it it is unlikely to become useful again, even as a redirect. – sgeureka^t•c 12:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Included in this TfD is the redirect Template:StargateRaces. – sgeureka ^t•c 15:31, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The main Stargate template contains much more detail and is used across stargate articles, there is no point in this limited template being kept . BritishWatcher (talk) 14:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Now orphaned and unused. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Stargate race (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned a while ago (for most SG races a few months ago) due to concerns that this infobox displayed mostly original research. Included in this nom is Template:Infobox Stargate race/doc and the redirect Template:Stargate race. – sgeureka ^t•c 12:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unused and unlikely to be used in future due to increased vigil in presenting fiction from out-of-universe. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:42, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Mostly if not totally redundant to ((Infobox character)) and it is orphaned. Peachey88 ^{(Talk Page | Contribs)} 14:15, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No point in keeping a template that isnt used across several stargate articles. BritishWatcher (talk) 14:24, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Now orphaned and unused. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:35, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stargate Blu-Ray Dates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, broken structure, never in use. Created by a newbie. The dates for the few Stargate-related Blurays can be mentioned in text as a normal table. – sgeureka ^t•c 12:32, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Orphan, although i did correct the syntax so it's displayed correctly now if that was the reason that it didn't get used. Peachey88 ^{(Talk Page | Contribs)} 14:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I cant see any reason for such a template and dont even understand why it was made in the first place :\. Its not used so no point in keeping it. BritishWatcher (talk) 14:33, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 12:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Philosophers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is no objective criteria for inclusion in this template, nor it is of much navigational use to the reader. It is not used in any articles, and has not been edited in over two years (since August 16, 2006). the skomorokh 12:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Unused and very limited list of philosophers. Main Philosophy template gives much more detail and links to a full list of philosophers around the world.BritishWatcher (talk) 14:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. Eusebeus (talk) 17:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The Western philosophers listed are among the most important, but even saying that is a POV. If retained, the template should be applied to the articles of the people named, but it would be much better if it were not kept. Categories do the job at least as well, and new articles do not have to be manually added. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 12:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Prison Break characters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I have transferred all info from that template to the main template, no more point in keeping it. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 17:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great job. I think you could tagged it for "speedy" deletion (7 days). Anyway,let's delete it. It was useless for the very beginning. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Well done for adding all the info to the main template. Clearly this one is no longer needed.BritishWatcher (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.