< April 13	April 15 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per T3 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Estonian Defence Forces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is an exact duplicate of Template:Estonian Military. I'm nominating this one for deletion since "Estonian Military" is slightly shorter and more straightforward. Quibik (talk) 23:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is speediable as T3 as a substantial duplicate of an existing template. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:32, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox National Historic Sites of Canada (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan and appears to be a fork of ((Infobox nhsc)) Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, then move the other template to use the less ambiguous name. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 22:39, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and then move ((Infobox nhsc)) to the page vacated by the deleted template. Airplaneman ✈ 23:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wrestling PPVs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Incomplete template that isn't exactly serving a useful purpose. Categories take care of the same job already and articles listed are not directly related to each other than being about PPVs. Several templates already exist covering the subject as well as categories. Reason for creation was to remove see also links it appears.--WillC 13:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not incomplete, it links to all the majors and if there were a page of international promotions it could quickly be added.

It's purpose, like all other similar templates, is to make it easy to find related topics.

There are no categories for this, and categories don't provide direct links.

The only similar template is the all promotion template, which is linked to on the main promotion page(not the lists) and wouldn't fit the list pages.

Main reason for creation was to provide a way to quicky get to related articles quickly.

Secondary reasion was to save space and decrease the redundancy of seeing the same pages being linked over and over again74.47.97.119 (talk) 13:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those are a few major US promotions. There are major promotions around the world. There is AAA, CMLL, NWA, NJPW, AJPW, NOAH, Dragon Gate, etc. Thus it is incomplete.--WillC 13:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To quote myself "and if there were a page of international promotions it could quickly be added." Also to note, not all promotions run PPVs. It's complete as in every promotion that has a list on wikipedia is linked to. Once more pages are created they can quickly be added to this template, no need to add to each page individualy. If you can find a promotion that isn't listed add it.74.47.97.119 (talk) 13:51, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All the promotions mentioned by Will have both pages and they've promoted PPVs - thus your argument in it's entirety is not correct and seems to indicate that you could not even be bothered to search for say CMLL. MPJ -DK 09:44, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - For the foreseeable future this template will always be incomplete as there is a lack of information on international PPVs, I think the Abbreviations aren't helpful, plus it misses DGUSA and a few Indy promotions which do host some PPV events through GoFightLive. Just a quick point out on the above discussion you say the template isn't incomplete, but later state anything can be added later, which would mean that it is incomplete. 81.141.96.49 (talk) 13:58, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article for deletion entry isn't linked to anywhere but the template page. Above delete vote doesn't have a single edit before coming here. Obvious that it's the same user that nominated. 74.47.97.119 (talk) 14:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that isn't me. I'm busy creating the next newsletter to link this discussion. Which besides the project talk page is the only other place. That template is linked at all articles it is featured in as well as on here and the April 14 deletions page. I don't know how that ip found this page.--WillC 14:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can ask for a check user to be performed if you wish, I assure you I am not Wrestlinglover. 81.141.96.49 (talk) 15:04, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WillC. Since when was WWA in the "majors" ? ^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 17:31, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (Forgot to say). @above Title isn't major promotions, just promotions.Username1235 (talk) 18:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see no point in having a navigation for all wrestling related Pay Per Views - companies that have PPVs have their own navigation box, which makes sense - but a general one? where but on the Pay Per View page does it even make sense to use it? MPJ -DK 09:44, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per MPJ-DK: Yeah, its pretty stupid. $Raa G gio (talk)$ 20:02, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:51, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox The Green Green Grass Series 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Already covered by list of episodes, and prev and next links in individual episode boxes Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - redundant. Airplaneman ✈ 23:40, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Region2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned fork of ((Infobox region))? Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - redundant. Airplaneman ✈ 23:39, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Userfy per request Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Paris Network main content real (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template, which is redundant to ((Infobox Paris Network)) Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to my user space, will continue work and study of the template and its evolution. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 16:48, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox PGDA player (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template, which is most likely redundant to one of the ((Infobox athlete)) templates. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - redundant. Airplaneman ✈ 23:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Orthodox leadership (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template which is redundant to ((Infobox person)) or other templates. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - redundant. Airplaneman ✈ 23:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Locomotive Base (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old, orphaned fork of ((Infobox locomotive)) Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - redundant. Airplaneman ✈ 23:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 14:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox HRM Community Neighbourhood Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template, which is most likely redundant to say ((Infobox settlement)) or ((geobox)) Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 19:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox The Cleveland Show Season 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is currently being used to insert a season episode list into the infobox for an episode of The Cleveland Show. All other episodes in this season are simply using the prev and next navigation, and the list is redundant to the complete list presented in List of The Cleveland Show episodes. It's not clear why this is necessary, and seems to try to wedge too much information into the infobox. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm confused at the issue here as many shows use this list, including shows with large projects working on them(such as the simpsons and family guy to name two). The Cleveland show has already been picked up for a full second season, so while it may seem redundant if there is only one season, which in that case this template really serves no purpose that the main list can't have as well. However, with multiple seasons this is an easier way to navigate through individual seasons once you are already in an episode. You can enable it so the list is collapsed by default, like the simpsons uses, if the feeling exists it's too cluttered. Anyways with the second season starting in a few months this template will serve a much stronger purpose and has much more function than just previous and next episodeGrande13 (talk) 22:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It would make sense to me that if this functionality is desired, it should be incorporated in ((Infobox television episode)), rather than using some undocumented hack to wedge it where a link to a list would normally go. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - redundant to ((Infobox television episode)). A link to the episode list should suffice. Also per Plastikspork's nom and comment. Airplaneman ✈ 23:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.