The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Convert to a navbox and/or merge with ((South Korean armed forces)), which seems the most sensible.

Template:Republic of Korea Navy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary, no scope for use. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:04, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete , per nominator. Adrian (talk) 18:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or convert to navbox, which it should be. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:51, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Convert to Navbox - There is a purpose for this template, as other navies have navboxes at the end of their articles to link to shared subject articles which are also covered under the categories at the end of the article as well. As for lack of usage, then it only needs to be implemented properly. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JPG-GR (talk) 17:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and convert to navbox, although a "sidebar" navbox may be indicated here. --Bsherr (talk) 18:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Template:South Korean armed forces, which is sparsely populated, but covers a similar subject. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 22:44, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or convert to navbox. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:43, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Republic of Colombia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Superseded by ((Colombia topics)). — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge/keep to let editors decide if they prefer a sidebar or a footer. (use a switch, "sidebar=yes"/"footer=yes" depending on which name you activate. )65.93.14.196 (talk) 05:15, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment the name should atleast exist as a redirect. 65.93.14.196 (talk) 05:16, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JPG-GR (talk) 17:15, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to project space without redirect. Not in use. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 23:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No use for it in project space. After the above discussion, I (as nom) am in favour of redirecting it to ((Colombia topics)). — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak oppose it shouldn't be deleted until all the articles at this navbox are included at the new one MBelgrano (talk) 01:27, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 05:50, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Boxford (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template groups together small settlements in the electoral ward of Boxford. This is a highly unlikely grouping for users to require, outside of the context of Babergh District Council. The existence of Template:Babergh, which contains all of these settlements, measn that the Boxford template is just a duplication of information, and is overtemplating. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 11:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, and any templates others like it. --Kudpung (talk) 13:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - template serves no useful purpose and is a completely unnecessary duplication of Template:Babergh. nancy 06:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 05:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Watercat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Don't know what this is on about. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• It was used in the articles it links to, as a navigation box, but was replaced by "see also" links in 2007. Peter E. James (talk) 15:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 05:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WXCOM Local (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused external link template. Providing links to weather sites is probably not useful, but that is almost beside the point - this template is unused, period/full stop. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete all. Airplaneman ✈ 05:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Watchlistlink2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Watchlistlink3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Watchlistlink4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I BOLDly userfied ((Watchlistlink)), because there was only one user of it. The creator of that template (who is now retired) created these, which are just permutations of the one I userfied. No-one at all appears to use these, so they can be deleted. (The sole transclusion of ((Watchlistlink3)) is in a discussion, and is not a real use.) — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 05:55, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Watched (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Belongs to this failed proposal. Not used, no longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 05:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Watcher (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No scope for use. Creator indefinitely blocked. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Move to project space. This is what I would have done unilaterally in the first place, had I known the purpose of these templates. So that's why I have made this non-admin closure. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wasr psh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Wasr ssh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used. Purpose unclear. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• They were used in Wikipedia:WikiProject Washington State Highways/Completion list until November 2010[1]. It now transcludes pages that never existed. It's possible that these templates are still useful - they could be moved to the titles that are now transcluded, or the changes in that edit could be undone. Peter E. James (talk) 16:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but needs to be fixed, as when I was moving pages around I think I broke the links to the tmeplate. --Admrboltz (talk) 16:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Templates have been deorphaned and fixed. --Admrboltz (talk) 19:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Yeah, these look like completion list templates. Fix them if you care; I don't. --NE2 06:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - These serve a purpose. Dough4872 23:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to wikipedia namespace since just used by project pages - Wikipedia:WikiProject Washington State Highways/wasr psh and Wikipedia:WikiProject Washington State Highways/wasr ssh. -- WOSlinker (talk) 00:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's a good idea. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to the projectspace per WOSlinker—these templates are indeed used, just not in the mainspace. Airplaneman ✈ 05:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete, both templates were created at about the same time and appear to have the same authors, so history merge is not necessary. If someone believes a redirect is really necessary, one can be created. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:36, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Short Story Collections by Orson Scott Card (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by ((OrsonScottCard)). — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect this was merged with Template:Novels by Orson Scott Card. Peter E. James (talk) 16:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—Template:Novels by Orson Scott Card in turn redirects to Template:OrsonScottCard; since there are no current uses, I believe a redirect would be useless. Airplaneman ✈ 06:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfy. I will perform a history merge with this and User:Rentastrawberry/Warning Template, the target page which already exists, holding an older version of the template. A redirect will not be created. Airplaneman ✈ 06:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Warning box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Yet another "humor" template which is not very funny. And, it's not used. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to User:Rentastrawberry/Warning Template without redirect. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 23:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Userfy. I think it's funny, and it says right on the page: "This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.". --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 03:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Warez TOC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Effectively a TOC (all the hashlinks). Unnecessary. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Unnecessary, as a table of contents with the correct links to the headings is included automatically in the article. If the headings need to be simplified this should be done in the article instead of a second TOC. Peter E. James (talk) 16:15, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete 134.253.26.6 (talk) 23:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Redundant to the infobox already in place at Cimbrian War. Airplaneman ✈ 06:50, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Warbox Cimbrian War (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Information exists at Cimbrian War. Single-use template; no longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WRC rally surface legend (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Purpose unclear. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Where it is used, it has been subsituted (or possibly copied from one article to another) instead of being transcluded. Peter E. James (talk) 16:21, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:46, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WWIIWesternDesertCampaign (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Purpose unclear. Where is this meant to be placed? — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unplaced, unused (and the table formatting looks dated to my eye). WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 00:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WXCOM 10 Day (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

See previous nomination. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WXCOM Hourly (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused external link template that is promotional in tone and unnecessary. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WaceBioshort (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused citation template. Possibly superseded in some cases by ((WaceBio)). — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:War of Kings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. I don't really understand Marvel Comics, but I believe that their characters often appear in multiple comic series. I think this one has a bit of overlap with X-Men. That, and the fact that the main topic of this box only has a subsection of an article to itself, suggests we don't need this anymore. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:39, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wakatake class destroyer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Two blue links. WP:NENAN. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Brad (talk) 21:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted per WP:G7. Non-admin closure. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wales year nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Too big to be of any practical use. There are existing templates like ((Year in Wales header)) which do a better job. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to see it go as it is unused. FruitMonkey (talk) 12:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wahlergebnisse (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. I'm not sure quite what this does (the documentation is in Germlish), but we have a complete, working set of election templates that does not involve this one. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:48, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WVWP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Never substituted. Four years old. No scope for use. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WUSTLarticles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by ((WUSTL)). — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WUSA team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by ((Infobox Football club)). — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WTVGHide (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Purpose unclear. Creator seems to be gone, so they will not be able to help us here. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WTA Tier I 1988-2008 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Too tall. Superseded by the yearly templates in Category:WTA Tour tournaments by season templates. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted under CSD G7: author request. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sftvindxbottom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Replaced by ((sftvpr)) (which should probably be deleted, but that's beside the point here). — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Sure, go ahead and delete it, if you have administrative rights. It's my oldest attempt to organize the contents of this page, which is becoming larger as I add more and more items, and was badly in need of a contents table. Also, as you pointed out, I've already replaced it with ((sftvpr)).
  But I don't see the reason behind your assessment to delete ((sftvpr)). Just tell me what's wrong with it, and I'll adjust it accordingly, if it's breaking any wiki policies.
  Thanks for listening.
  MDGx^☹☺ 06:21, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for that message. I'll speedy delete this template. The problem with List of science fiction television programs is that it has no less than three contents lists - a navbar, a category-like TOC panel, and a navbox. ((sftvpr)) is a misuse of a navbox (see WP:NAVBOX). As for the others, I am wondering why a normal standard Table of Contents can't be used - I've tried it out in preview, and it seems to work fine (apart from the unfortunate alphabetical headings... but that's a minor concern). I suggest you reconsider your use of non-standard ToC elements in that article. Thanks, — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was project-ify to Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/MCOTWN. Airplaneman ✈ 07:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MCOTWN (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. The Medical Collaboration of the Week is gone; WP:MCOTM is the replacement. It does not appear to use this long-forgotten template. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Projectify move to WP:WikiProject Medicine/MCOTWN and let them use it as they may, if they happen to revive it, they could use it then. 64.229.103.232 (talk) 05:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 07:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CEM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old, unused template; the "mediator" class of users is now deprecated. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)]][reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AprilFoools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, misspelled template. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 02:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• It was used, 4 times, all on April 1, 2008. Nothing recently, so delete. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 23:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BI (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and ambiguous template name; redundant to ((delsort|Bilateral relations)). :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 02:35, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy close The "template" is not marked with a TfD banner, and it is not a template, it is a redirect. Redirects go in RfD. 64.229.103.232 (talk) 05:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, it was the wrong nomination. I have fixed the template title (it turned out I mixed up the I with an l). :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 07:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Redundant to paramtereized delsort template. --Bsherr (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Airplaneman ✈ 06:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Attack (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template seems quite redundant to many other standardized user warning templates. Perhaps it should be redirected to either Template:Uw-npa3 or Template:Db-attack-notice. It was also once moved to the previous Template:Uw-attack (which is now a redirect to Template:Uw-npa1 in this edit history but was reverted afterwards instead. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 02:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Attack pages are covered by Wikipedia:Attack page. This is distinguished from Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Attack pages are actually a NPOV issue, usually. So the case could be made to redirect to the uw-npov series, but this may be a situation in which the specific warning is necessary. Redirecting to db-notice isn't a workable result because speedy deletion isn't always the remedy, or the warning may follow the execution of the deletion, rendering the advice in the db-notice useless. The template should be formatted for uw and kept as a separate template. --Bsherr (talk) 18:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As Bsherr mentions this template is concerned with creating Attack pages not personal attacks against editors. Therefore, redirecting or merging it with any NPA related template is not appropriate. Redirecting to a Db related template is only appropriate if the page has been tagged for deletion. Bsherr makes a fair point about it being an NPOV issue, but I feel in this case we should maintain a specific template; despite its infrequent use. Pol430 talk to me 22:11, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WTA Ranking Points Distribution 2008 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by the updated table at Women's_Tennis_Association#Ranking_method. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:14, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Disamb-also (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Produces, with three inputs, a standard intro (lead) of a disambiguation page:

• ((disamb-also|Kendal|is a market town in Cumbria, England|It)) →
  ((disamb-also|Kendal|is a market town in Cumbria, England|It)).
  

This is not a hatnote, spacing and punctuation & grammar is very sensitive, and in general, the introduction of a page can well be written manually. The template does add nothing. I have removed four from disambiguation-pages. DePiep (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Too specific to be of much use. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 06:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WVint (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded fork from ((jctint)) - orphaned. Admrboltz (talk) 01:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: if this is to be deleted, please delete everything in Special:PrefixIndex/Template:WVint as well. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 02:44, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nom. Dough4872 23:11, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect to ((distinguish)). Airplaneman ✈ 06:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you mean (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hatnote. Produces the text Did you mean PAGE2?, which has the wrong tone for a reader. I could replace all ~15 uses with a ((distinguish)) or ((for)), with more neutral language. In general, I don't think we want to address a reader this way. DePiep (talk) 01:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• redirect to ((distinguish)), since Google writes that on their results page, so would be a useful redirect. 64.229.103.232 (talk) 05:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is that what the external google-gadget on the talkpage is about? I do not see a link with this template, looks like in another situation (search). -DePiep (talk) 11:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete after replacing with another disambiguation hatnote. Probably ((distinguish)) or, and don't forget this one, ((misspelling)). --Bsherr (talk) 18:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bsherr: Yes, ~15 articles are changed, and indeed with those from your suggestion list. ((misspelled)) was at hand, but not needed. -DePiep (talk) 07:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, now orphaned and better addressed by "distinguish". 134.253.26.9 (talk) 23:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect We are still seeing "Did you mean" being used and with a redirect it should be easier for people to find the hatnote templates. — Dispenser 13:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:48, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Reactionbox Catalyst (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Reactionbox Name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used. Simple enough to write the code instead of using this. (Relisting, due to rejection of earlier nomination on technical grounds.) — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. A comment was made on the previous nomination that the template is used by Template:Reactionbox. However, AFAICS, that is no longer the case. If I have missed anything, I am very happy to be corrected. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, I see what's going on now. That sort of "free invocation" of templates as occurs in Template:Reactionbox Entry is quite offputting. I can see now that either these stay or the whole reactionbox family goes. I'm going to withdraw this nomination. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:48, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.