The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 16:58, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Piranhaconda Facebook Fan Page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, which could only be used on one page Piranhaconda and is almost certainly against the External links policy because it is a link to a fan page on a social network Mrmatiko (talk) 18:20, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete - It's not even a proper template at all, just a spam link. Even the one article it would be used for, Piranhaconda, shouldn't exist to begin with, in accordance with WP: CRYSTAL.--Martin IIIa (talk) 15:22, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was  Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_November_27#November_27. Ruslik_Zero 17:18, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Units in Age of Empires II (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

None of the items in the navbox is an article about a unit of the "Age of Empires" game (and, of course, there will never be such articles), but about the real military topics depicted in the game. Cambalachero (talk) 17:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't care about the template's existence, but I and others have removed it from various articles per WP:MILPOP. It may be worth converting it to a list and/or adding it only to Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 08:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Lord of mercy. Apparently created as an alternative to having junk IPC sections in each of these articles. Another alternative, one which I strongly favour, is not to bother at all. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:22, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Listify or subst into AoEII:AoK, and then delete. bd2412 T 19:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
  • A list of units in a game is just WP:GAMEGUIDE, and would (hopefully) never be considered an appropriate standalone list. Nor does merging to the main game template improve that template. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 17:00, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Albert Odyssey series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely redundant. The only contents are links to three articles, two of which are merely redirects to the third one.Martin IIIa (talk) 16:25, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was  Relisted to Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_November_27#November_27. Ruslik_Zero 17:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Global Professional Basketball League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Defunct basketball league whose teams are questionably notable. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 17:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:North Jersey Runnin' Regulators (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The only link on it is to a category. It's an unused template for a team with questionable notability and this template has also been abandoned. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 17:04, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Modena City Ramblers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Been around for a few years now but just contains redlinks, so no navigational use. WOSlinker (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Only red links = get rid of it. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's of no use. --Axel™ (talk) 17:37, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 17:06, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox saalihoki klubi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Something to do with an Estonian floorball team? Not English; apparently copied from somewhere; not used. The creator's only contribution. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Unusable here. bd2412 T 19:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - Isn't even formatted to be a working template. No use whatsoever, probably created by mistake.--Martin IIIa (talk) 15:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete all. Ruslik_Zero 17:09, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CityRail platform box 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:CityRail platform box 3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:CityRail platform box 4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:CityRail platform box 5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:CityRail platform box 6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I merged these into one template (template:CityRail platform box). Frietjes (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.