The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as it appears these are all orphaned. If the templates are unmerged, and these are needed again, let me know and I will restore them. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:09, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AACTA Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DirectorsGuildofAmericaAwardFeatureFilm footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:The Golden Lion footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:GoldenGlobeBestTVMiniseriesFilm footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:GuldbaggeAwardBestActor footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:GuldbaggeAwardBestActress footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:GuldbaggeAwardBestFilm footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:GuldbaggeAwardBestSupportingActor footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Independent Spirit Award for Best Male Lead footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Palme d'Or footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Prix de la mise en scene footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Prix d'interprétation féminine footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Prix d'interprétation masculine footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Saturn Award for Best Horror Film footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

all redirects after template mergers.Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• NB These are only orphans because Robsinden (talk · contribs) has been trying to force a verdict in his favor at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_June_13#Template:GuldbaggeAwardBestFilm_footer by merging everything. They should not have been orphaned prior to a consensus determination.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith, I'm not trying to force anything. I (maybe erroneously) understood consensus had been reached. But you must admit, they are an improvement. In any case, these are already nominated and any discussion can be continued at the previous discussion. --Rob Sinden (talk) 05:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Parallels (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and maybe OR too? Magioladitis (talk) 20:56, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• delete as unused and unnecessary. Frietjes (talk) 18:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pariksa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No reason to use this template than just typing or copy-pasting the word itself. Magioladitis (talk) 20:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• delete as unnecessary. Frietjes (talk) 18:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SinCityYarn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. We have standard infoboxes to use anyway. Magioladitis (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• delete as unused and unnecessary. Frietjes (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 29 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:19, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Youth football competitions navbox is not necessary.

Template:Paraguay Squad 2009 South American Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:Paraguay Squad 2009 FIFA U-20 World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Banhtrung1 (talk) 13:48, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:14, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both per recent consensus here that such youth templates are not notable. GiantSnowman 14:30, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both Templates for youth tournaments are not notable. Number 57 16:09, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both as not notable....William 11:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• delete. participation in a youth squad is not notable enough for a distinct squad navbox. Frietjes (talk) 18:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all - All recent discussion confirmed to delete these navboxes. Banhtrung1 (talk) 08:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • When you nominate templates for deletion, it is no need to vote in the discussion. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.