The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Alakzi (talk) 08:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Gambling by country (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:NAVBOX 3 and 5.Curb Chain (talk) 21:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It's quite common for "<topic> in <country>" articles to have a navbox that links to other "<same topic> in <other country>" articles, such as all the navboxes implemented with ((Europe topic)) and ((Africa topic)). It's likely that a visitor to one of these articles is interested in other similar articles. I don't see any reason why the same wouldn't apply to gambling articles. Toohool (talk) 23:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Clearly meets the navbox guideline. 2005 (talk) 00:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Appropriate navbox, useful to those studying laws and culture of various nations as regards this particular activity. Montanabw^(talk) 05:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Alakzi (talk) 09:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Leaders of the Tiger Cub Economies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:NAVBOX 1,3,4.Curb Chain (talk) 20:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• This one clearly to me says delete, since the leader is not the nation, and it is the nations that are of interest to the "Tiger Cub economy". --Izno (talk) 22:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Of minimal use, will require constant upkeep, quickly dated. Montanabw^(talk) 05:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Alakzi (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Countries with Tiger Cub Economy Status (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:NAVBOX 1,3,4.Curb Chain (talk) 20:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm going to cite WP:NENAN here in combination with a comment that the nations included in this template are all going to link each other, anyway, for other reasons. A navbox to link them doesn't seem necessary. Delete. --Izno (talk) 22:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I support NENAN for a template with only four entries, but what's the potential for this list to grow... four articles might cross-link, but eight or nine start getting clunky. Montanabw^(talk) 05:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 2#Template:2009 flu pandemic in Oceania table. Alakzi (talk) 09:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2009 flu pandemic in Oceania table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used on it's one respective article; should be substituted and deleted.Curb Chain (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: It's a template transcluded as a table, keeping the references on the template. It's unusual, but it makes sense in the context it is used; I don't see a policy against its inclusion, it's not being used as a navbox. Montanabw^(talk) 05:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's plenty of precedent for this (Template:Kurds infobox, Template:Infobox Kosovo War). Wikipedia:Templates: "Templates are pages that are embedded (transcluded) into other pages to allow for the repetition of information". WP:TMP: "The Template namespace on Wikipedia is used to store templates, which contain Wiki markup intended for inclusion on multiple pages, usually via transclusion.Curb Chain (talk) 15:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment at the time this was created, data was changing rapidly, and the table was separated to reduce edit conflicts, and improve article and table editability -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• delete after substitution. and possibly, move to articlespace and/redirect to preserve attribution. Frietjes (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 2#Template:2009 flu pandemic in Europe table. Alakzi (talk) 09:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2009 flu pandemic in Europe table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used on it's one respective article; should be substituted and deleted.Curb Chain (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: It's a template transcluded as a table, keeping the references on the template. It's unusual, but it makes sense in the context it is used; I don't see a policy against its inclusion, it's not being used as a navbox. Montanabw^(talk) 05:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's plenty of precedent for this (Template:Kurds infobox, Template:Infobox Kosovo War). Wikipedia:Templates: "Templates are pages that are embedded (transcluded) into other pages to allow for the repetition of information". WP:TMP: "The Template namespace on Wikipedia is used to store templates, which contain Wiki markup intended for inclusion on multiple pages, usually via transclusion.Curb Chain (talk) 15:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And there is precedent to keep it too, see the elements infoboxes (eg. Template:Infobox hydrogen). Christian75 (talk) 08:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment at the time this was created, data was changing rapidly, and the table was separated to reduce edit conflicts, and improve article and table editability -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• delete after substitution. and possibly, move to articlespace and/redirect to preserve attribution. Frietjes (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• keep per Montanabw Christian75 (talk) 08:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 2#Template:2009 flu pandemic in Africa table. Alakzi (talk) 09:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2009 flu pandemic in Africa table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used on it's one respective article; should be substituted and deleted.Curb Chain (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: It's a template transcluded as a table, keeping the references on the template. It's unusual, but it makes sense in the context it is used; I don't see a policy against its inclusion, it's not being used as a navbox. Montanabw^(talk) 05:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's plenty of precedent for this (Template:Kurds infobox, Template:Infobox Kosovo War). Wikipedia:Templates: "Templates are pages that are embedded (transcluded) into other pages to allow for the repetition of information". WP:TMP: "The Template namespace on Wikipedia is used to store templates, which contain Wiki markup intended for inclusion on multiple pages, usually via transclusion.Curb Chain (talk) 15:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment at the time this was created, data was changing rapidly, and the table was separated to reduce edit conflicts, and improve article and table editability -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• delete after substitution. and possibly, move to articlespace and/redirect to preserve attribution. Frietjes (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 23:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Archived Talk page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to ((Talk archive)); suggest redirecting. Alakzi (talk) 11:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Given the odd capitalization, less than 100 uses, and naturally the redundancy, I'm inclined to delete. --Izno (talk) 11:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of 47 transclusions, 38 come from User talk:Utcursch/archive, so yeah, delete. Alakzi (talk) 12:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit reqeust added will be (hopefully)  deleted. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 04:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep revised version. Rationale for nomination has been obviated by revision; renominate if there are other reasons to delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 23:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:MBC Programs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is useless. 90% of the links point to the Korean Wikipedia articles, which is misleading and useless for Ebglish-speaking readers, plus Wikipedia is not a TV Guide, to change the content of the template every month according to which series is on play at the moment. This goes over the function of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia. Teemeah ^{편지 (letter)} 11:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with the rationale but do not find it sufficient for deletion. I have cleaned up the template (version nominated for deletion) IAW with our various applicable policies, guidelines, and essays and see no issue with the resultant template (see also WP:NENAN). Keep. --Izno (talk) 12:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge. Opabinia regalis (talk) 23:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Search archives (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - 165 transclusions
• Template:Archive banner (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - 408 transclusions

Propose merging Template:Search archives with Template:Archive banner.

Identical function, only stylistic differences. No need for two templates. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support merge: No sense duplicating effort. Montanabw^(talk) 05:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support merge yes, this seems logical. Although can the styling in ((search archives)) be used instead of the styling in ((archive banner)), it looks much better? —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 04:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.