The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, there is nothing to merge Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Paris Metro/next (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Paris Metro/next branch (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Paris Metro/next special (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Paris Metro/connections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Paris Metro/eastern terminus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Paris Metro/western terminus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Paris Metro/next, Template:Paris Metro/next branch and Template:Paris Metro/next special with Template:S-line.
All redundant to the simpler and standard ((S-line)) template. In addition, S-line is already configured for Paris Métro stations and some stations [Edit: All stations. Apparently an IP removed all the remaining transclusions of these templates. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use ((ping|Jc86035)) to reply to me 04:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)] have already been converted from these templates to S-line (such as Châtelet). Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use ((ping|Jc86035)) to reply to me 14:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete the Paris Metro templates after replacing, we already have a system for this. Frietjes (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • added template:Paris Metro/connections, which is part of the same system. Frietjes (talk) 15:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Added Template:Paris Metro/eastern terminus and Template:Paris Metro/western terminus Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use ((ping|Jc86035)) to reply to me 04:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was 'delete per nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bolehall Swifts F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN - bar the link to the parent article three other links just go to categories and the ground is a redirect to the parent article. Not currently a useful aid to navigation and for such a small club unlikely to be so in the future. Fenix down (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not help navigation and unlikely ever to be improved upon as it's such a minor club. JMHamo (talk) 16:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Constituent Communities of Schlüsselfeld (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant template JMHamo (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete Frietjes (talk) 17:28, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unneed without a parent article Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Forza Rossa Racing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template based around a speculative race team, Forza Rossa, which had its article deleted for failing GNG. Has virtually no use since the team never materialised. QueenCake (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. DH85868993 (talk) 02:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Obviously has no use at the moment. I have have to refute the "never materialized" claim. They never planned to absolutely enter in 2015 in the first place. 2016 was their principal goal all along. Because some speculated that they might already enter in 2015 and that unsurprisingly didn't materialize the premature and incorrect conclusion is made that the team itself didn't materialize. Tvx1 (talk) 21:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.