The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 June 10. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:15, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Georgia State Panthers quarterback navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:EXISTING -- It is unused and the links listed do not have an article. It doesn't seem like they'll be created anytime soon. Write the articles first. Corky | Chat? 16:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nominator's rationale. We can argue about how many blue links are enough, or what percentage of the total links must be for existing stand-alone articles, but ZERO blue links and ZERO PERCENT links to existing content is a FAIL any way your slice it. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. Also fails WP:NAVBOX No. 4: "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template". No point of navbox clutter is a topic isn't even worthy of its own standalone article.—Bagumba (talk) 18:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Truth be told, I am not a fan of any of the "starting quarterback" navboxes - even for programs where all the entries are notable. It's over-templating (and Bagumba's point about stand alone articles is true). Rikster2 (talk) 22:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @Rikster2: Roger that, Rik. Now go convince 6 or 7 WP:CFB editors and we can get rid of all of them -- most of the CFB starting QB navboxes are inaccurate, incomplete and confusing. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TJM icon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:TJM line links (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:TJM route/Line 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:TJM route/Line 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:TJM route/Line 3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:TJM route/Line 9 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 14:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment to closing admin: ((TJM route/Line 1)), ((TJM route/Line 2)), ((TJM route/Line 3)) and ((TJM route/Line 9)) should be redirected to their line articles (Line 1, Tianjin Metro et al.) and not deleted, to preserve attribution (since they were substituted). Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 10:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:23, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SZM icon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:SZM icon links (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:SZM line color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:SZM line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:SZM line/box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:SZM line/name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:SZM line cell (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:SZM line link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:SZM line links (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 07:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Denzel Washington sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another redundant actor's sidebar. As per previous consensus on these, with only three links which are already provided in the main article, it is not needed. Cowlibob (talk) 23:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:30, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SHM icon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to ((Rail-interchange)). Jc86035 (talk | contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 12:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, broken editing test. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:13, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chennai Egmore-Thanjavur Main Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Possible duplication of Template:Chennai Egmore–Thanjavur line. No need of this vague template. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 10:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SHM line links (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Merged with Shanghai section of ((China line)) (now in holding cell) into ((Rail-interchange)) and ((Rail color box)), now redundant to the latter two templates. Jc86035 (talk | contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 10:04, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:51, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BJS line links (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Merged with Beijing section of ((China line)) (now in holding cell) into ((Rail-interchange)) and ((Rail color box)), now redundant to the latter two templates. Jc86035 (talk | contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 10:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:51, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BJS icon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to ((Rail-interchange)). Jc86035 (talk | contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 10:00, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:27, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SZM icon link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 06:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SZM box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 06:00, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.