The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hello Baby (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All seasons of the show were merged/redirected, so all the links in the template are redirects. Random86 (talk) 20:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Main article suffices. — Wyliepedia 08:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Links within the navbox all redirect to Hello Baby at this time, negating the need for the template. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jimp 04:41, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Neg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template produces a hidden -(({1))} (i.e. 1st parameter preceded by a hyphen) and displays −(({1))} (i.e. 1st parameter preceded by a minus sign). The intention was for numbers to be sorted correctly. It may have been useful in 2008 when it was created but now it is not as "−" (a minus sign) is recognised by the sorting thing anyway. The code should be replaced by −(({1))}, all transclusions should be substituted then it should be deleted. Jimp 16:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• There's also ((Msym)). Alakzi (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • That should go too. Jimp 02:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• delete Frietjes (talk) 13:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was convert to list. Similar lists already exist, and this template cites at least one unreliable source, but I'm going to to list it in the holding cell just in case there's anything salvageable here. Opabinia regalis (talk) 23:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Highways of the 1927 Arizona Highway Plan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navbox does not appear to list all of the state highways in Arizona in 1927. Additionally, per past precedents, navboxes listing all of a state's highways have been deleted several times between 2005 and 2009. Imzadi 1979 → 04:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Can be better covered in a list. Dough4872 14:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• convert to a list article, if one doesn't already exist. Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not withstanding the fact that I can't see much value in a template listing Highways at an arbitrary point in time, this is a list masquerading as a template. Resolute 17:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, convert to a list if needed. --Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 22:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.