The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 00:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lacks template (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navboxes are not compulsory, and we should not have a template that implies that they are. (FWIW, I'm generally against them because they clog up the "what links here" feature). I will place a note at Wikipedia talk:Categories, lists, and navigation templates about this discussion. Graham87 14:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The current wording uses the term contemplate. I do not think that that is forceful language, so readers wouldn't mistake it as being compulsory.Hawaan12 (talk) 14:36, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • IMO the fact that the box is even there is forceful enough. We don't use article message boxes for such trivial issues. Graham87 14:44, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: the creator of this template also wrote a page in the Wikipedia namespace, Wikipedia:Produce a template, which I have boldly redirected to Help:A quick guide to templates, as the Wikipedia namespace isn't for personal essays like that, especially when couched in an official-seeming template. Graham87 14:44, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the nom. --Izno (talk) 14:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I agree that this template suggest that a navigational templates is expected or advised in every article, which isn't the case. Also Wikipedia:Template namespace#Guidelines says "Templates that provide information only of service to editors should not appear on article pages", which is where its creator was placing it. Qwfp (talk) 15:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- fails WP:TG. Templates that provide information only of service to editors should not appear on article pages. This is unnecessary clutter that would appear on every non-templated page -- even though templates are not required nor even suggested for every article. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nav templates are inappropriate for many articles. Hawaan12 appears to have run amok and added this message box to 106 pages, ironically including the page for running amok. In the event an editor feels there's a strong reason a group of articles would benefit from better navigation, the correct response is to create that template, rather than to tag the articles as needing to have a template created. Rupert Clayton (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not required or beneficial, for the reasons given above.--Srleffler (talk) 05:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I like navboxes (perhaps the "what links here" function could be further improved to address the nominator's complaint), but we don't need a template that says the article needs a template. The Moose is loose! 15:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete and add the one blue link to ((Texas A&M Aggies women's basketball navbox)). ~ Rob^Talk 02:10, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Texas A&M Aggies women's basketball coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:EXISTING -- The navbox is only used in the Gary Blair article, making it hard to navigate... 🍀 Corkythehornetfan 🍀 02:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 🍀 Corkythehornetfan 🍀 02:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete given the lack of blue links. The blue links should be added to ((Texas A&M Aggies women's basketball navbox)). --Izno (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Lizard (talk) 07:27, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).