The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Valid SVG/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Blank documentation page GXXF T • C 00:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, WP:SOFIXIT. Not a valid deletion rationale for a doc page. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ACRClosed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, very-short template. GXXF T • C 23:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bahnstreckenabschnitt Stuttgart Hbf–Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No objection to userfying (if someone cares to) or retaining in the template space (if this is transcluded somewhere). ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bahnstreckenabschnitt Stuttgart Hbf–Waiblingen (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No objection to userfying (if someone cares to) or retaining in the template space (if this is transcluded somewhere). ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Sphilbrick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Badminton at the 2014 Sukma Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, most articles don't exist. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:BLPVio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, and it's unclear where this would ever be used. On a talk page, usually a whole comment is reverted if necessary. On an article, we clearly shouldn't be placing something like this; we should just remove the violation. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom. I don't see why we need this either. Frietjes (talk) 15:56, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/0 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/8 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/9 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/line/interim (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/none (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/pending (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/review (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/sandbox/line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/sandbox/line/t (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ArbComOpenTasks/sandbox/t (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. These were deprecated back in 2012 or earlier and fully protected as they had no plans to reuse them in the future. I asked an Arb Clerk, and they still highly doubt these would ever be useful to the project. They were only preserved for page histories in the past, but it's questionable whether a broken open cases table would even affect page histories in a significant way, and we don't usually consider page histories when determining whether to delete/keep templates. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, if anyone really wants them we can undelete them latter. Frietjes (talk) 15:56, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete most and relist the four mentioned women's football templates. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:46, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:South Korea men's football squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete speedy: It is unnecessary due to being a non-Olympian multi-sport event. Like this entry.

And more similar templates must be deleted:

Template:South Korea women's football squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Pakistan men's football squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Iran Squad 2014 Asian Games Men's Volleyball (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Korea Men Basketball Squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Korea Women Basketball Squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Philippines Men Basketball Squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Thailand men's football squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Iran football squad 1974 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Hong Kong men's football squad 1990 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Hong Kong men's football squad 1994 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Hong Kong men's football squad 1998 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Padania squad 2008 Viva World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (not notable)

Template:Canada women football squad 2003 Pan American Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Canada women football squad 2007 Pan American Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:United States men football squad 2007 Pan American Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:United States women football squad 2007 Pan American Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Argentina squad 1964 Taça das Nações (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Brazil squad 1960 Taça do Atlântico (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)

Template:Brazil squad 1976 Taça do Atlântico (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)

Template:Brazil squad 1995 Umbro Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)

Template:Brazil squad 1997 Tournoi de France (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)

Template:Uruguay squad 1980 Mundialito (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)

Template:Brazil squad 1980 Mundialito (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)

And all templates included in this and this categories. JackHoang (talk) 03:39, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, navbox creep. Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep women's football squads from Pan American Games, South Korea women's football squad 2014 Asian Games. Hmlarson (talk) 00:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unnecessary navbox creep. These athletes aren't known for participation in these squads. It's a tiny portion of their career. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:05, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 27 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Communities of Oak Ridges, Ontario (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:01, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Steel industry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Iron and steel production (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Steel industry with Template:Iron and steel production.
Hardly used and the currect format are not easy to expand. 2001:DA8:201:3512:BCE6:D095:55F1:36DE (talk) 13:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• merge Frietjes (talk) 15:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:01, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cocoa production (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Chocolate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Cocoa production with Template:Chocolate.
Only used in unrelated pages; use Chocolate template instead. 2001:DA8:201:3512:BCE6:D095:55F1:36DE (talk) 13:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge or just delete ((Cocoa production)) which doesn't seem to serve much purpose. Deli nk (talk) 19:38, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cotton production (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Cotton sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Cotton production with Template:Cotton sidebar.
No need for a specific template for such number of article. 2001:DA8:201:3512:BCE6:D095:55F1:36DE (talk) 13:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• weak oppose, I see no overlap in the links, and it's not clear if there is a preference for the sidebar vs the navbox. Frietjes (talk) 15:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Shimane Maru class aircraft carrier (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and duplicates navigation found in Template:WWII Japanese ships Frietjes (talk) 15:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Re-added to article. Provides additional at-a-glance information not included in Template:WWII Japanese ships — Bellhalla (talk) 16:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bellhalla, both the links go to the same page, so it's not really providing any navigation. if you are viewing the template, you are on Shimane Maru-class escort carrier and can see Shimane Maru-class escort carrier#Ships without having to uncollapse the navbox at the bottom. Frietjes (talk) 18:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nothing to navigate. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).