September 4
Template:ABC Land
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Speedily deleted as a blatant hoax. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 10:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No likelihood of ever being used; this template seems to be about a theme park/resort that does not and likely never will exist. (I honestly wouldn't be surprised if this actually qualifies for G3 speedy deletion.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Laguna Pistons roster
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Following the replacement of its article by a redirect, the template is not used and has no likelihood of being used. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laguna Pistons. Certes (talk) 23:46, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Post-nominals/USA
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Unused and unlikely ever to be used. Americans don't use post-nominals, except perhaps for serving personnel ("USN", "USAF"), but we wouldn't use them here. Other parameters are redundant to ((Post-nominals/AUS)) and ((Post-nominals/NZL)). DrKay (talk) 20:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Presence
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant to Template:Led Zeppelin songs ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Physical Graffiti
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant to Template:Led Zeppelin songs ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Led Zeppelin IV
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant to Template:Led Zeppelin songs ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:In Through the Out Door
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant to Template:Led Zeppelin songs ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Houses of the Holy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant to Template:Led Zeppelin songs ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Coda
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant to Template:Led Zeppelin songs ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:CopyrightedFreeUseProvided
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Template that is taken over and completely changed beyond it original meaning. The original template was about the "Autocephalous and Autonomous Churches of Eastern Orthodoxy" but one editor changed it beyound recognition, without any discussion (at least not visible on the talk page). A revert to this version is also a possibility. The Banner talk 12:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. This template is valid as an equivalent to footer templates of other Christian denominations. Feel free to improve it though. Not that I understand how outright deleting information will help Wikipedia. Chicbyaccident (talk) 13:21, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment and oppose. Honesty speaking, this is a drastic, and much needed improvement by @Chicbyaccident:. I commend them from turning this simple template into something more.--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Fb rbr templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:13, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No need after creating Module:Sports rbr table and module has more customs and options than these templates. See also: WT:WikiProject Football/Archive 118#Proposed round-by-round module Note: We are converting these templates to module these days and this discussion only discuss whether we should delete or not after converting all these templates to the module Hhkohh (talk) 11:16, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- delete after they have all been replaced. there are still about 4000 articles to update, but we should be able to manage that in a few weeks. Frietjes (talk) 13:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. I've been editing positions by round tables of club seasons recently with the newly proposed Module:Sports rbr table. I feel that it makes my edits easier and more clear than the templates listed above. — Phenolla ⚫️🔵 12:58, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).