Template:Hopes Die Last
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Typical musical act navboxes are supposed to link four or more related articles together. Only three notable subjects are linked, and the other two are not supposed to be included as corresponding pages redirect to the band's article. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:04, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, articles are connected through the succession links in the infoboxes. Frietjes (talk) 23:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Channel Awesome
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Only three articles, not enough for a good navbox. ミラP 15:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 16:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it seems this navbox was made too soon. If/when Channel Awesome's other shows have their own pages then it could be useful. Mujinga (talk) 05:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:WikiProject 24
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:WikiProject Television. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging with Template:WikiProject Television.
The discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Turning all inactive TV-show Wikiprojects into WP:WPTV taskforces resulted in turning the following inactive WikiProjects into WikiProject Television task forces. I propose the following:
- The task forces should be added to the main template so it can support them as it does other task forces.
- Subst the templates with the TV one.
- Delete duplication on the same page.
- Finally deleting the templates - as these are a closed-set of articles, there won't be many, if even any, new articles that will be tagged with these. Gonnym (talk) 13:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Added The X-Files template. --Gonnym (talk) 01:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support As the creator of The Twilight Zone WikiProject, I'm OK with this. The project went nowhere after the first few months, so at worst, it makes no difference, and maybe it'll get some activity. And it sure doesn't need multiple templates out there.travisl (talk) 19:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I've previously advocated for merging task force templates with the parent project and even had a few of these on my to nominate list but never got around to it. I also want to explicitly state that the existing categories for the task forces will stay the same as this is a common concern. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 00:38, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as they're inactive Atlantic306 (talk) 05:35, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy merge all and retain appropriate wrappers/redirects. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as they're inactive SerTanmay (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Seems reasonable. –MJL ‐Talk‐🤶 05:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per all above. = paul2520 (talk) 18:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, from the examples I've seen related to episodes of series mentioned in the proposal, it makes sense. PKT(alk) 18:05, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).