The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:SEPTA Former style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Same rationale as Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 2#SEPTA style templates. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, template has been succeeded. BLAIXX 12:58, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Module:String. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Module:PatternCount (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Module:String (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Module:PatternCount with Module:String.
Consolidate string-related module functions under Module:String ((3x|p))ery (talk) 21:52, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete/Merge redundant to Module:Text count, which is being merged with Module:String. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 05:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Spoken article entry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is used for spoken article files, but all of the files have been transferred to Commons, so this template is no longer being used. Also, this template has been superseded by the one on Commons. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 07:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:NENAN (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:EHF Player of the Year Women (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded (WP:NENAN), could be merged with the below nomination but I think both should be deleted DannyS712 (talk) 05:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a new award, of the European Handball Federation. We will need both Template:IHF World Player of the Year (men) and Template:IHF World Player of the Year Women (women) like in the case of the IHF World Player of the Year award by the International Handball Federation. It should not be deleted or even merged! As per football also. You just nominate to nominate? Why do you nominate if you know nothing about the organisation on Wikipedia? Christina (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very important award, handball only has 2, IHF World Player of the Year and EHF Player of the Year (basically the European Player of the Year). It's the continental award. On women's handball we also separated templated and a lot more awards like [[1]], [[2]] etc. As a specifically handball editor, I am telling you this nomination is not good. Christina (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:NENAN (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:EHF Player of the Year Men (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded (WP:NENAN), could be merged with the above nomination but I think both should be deleted DannyS712 (talk) 05:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a new award, of the European Handball Federation. We will need both Template:IHF World Player of the Year (men) and Template:IHF World Player of the Year Women (women) like in the case of the IHF World Player of the Year award by the International Handball Federation. It should not be deleted or even merged! As per football also. You just nominate to nominate? Why do you nominate if you know nothing about the organisation on Wikipedia? Christina (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very important award, handball only has 2, IHF World Player of the Year and EHF Player of the Year (basically the European Player of the Year). It's the continental award. On women's handball we also separated templated and a lot more awards like [[3]], [[4]] etc. As a specifically handball editor, I am telling you this nomination is not good. Christina (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 06:43, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:United Kingdom local elections, 1896 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Main article doesn't exist, neither should the navbox; only 4 of the 67 links lead to articles that exist. DannyS712 (talk) 05:38, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The main article is likely to be created at some point, and it already serves as navigation between the articles that have been started. This is a useful part of a series. Number 57 11:58, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I agree with Number 57 (although I would say that, as I did create the page). If it makes the decision easier, I am in the process of making the main 1896 page. Thanks MrPenguin21 (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. Also moving the template to Template:1896 United Kingdom local elections. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 03:03, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: If kept (which seems it is), hopefully someone can move all templates at Category:United Kingdom election templates to match the parent article names. --Gonnym (talk) 22:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 16. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Nippon_Professional_Draft_by_year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 16. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NGC_Series_banknotes_and_coins (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 16. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Philippine_peso_NGC_coins (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 16. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Philippine_peso_NGC_bills (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 16. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Philippine_Piso_NGC_series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Module:TrophyCase (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to Template:String count. ((3x|p))ery (talk) 03:12, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).