The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:48, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:S-line/Metra left/BNSF Railway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra left/CNW North (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra left/Heritage Corridor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra left/Metra Electric (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra left/Milwaukee District/North (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra left/Milwaukee District/West (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra left/Rock Island (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra left/SouthWest Service (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra left/Union Pacific/North (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra left/Union Pacific/Northwest (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra left/Union Pacific/West (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra right/CNW North (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra right/Metra Electric (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra right/Rock Island (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra right/Union Pacific/North (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra right/Union Pacific/Northwest (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metra right/Union Pacific/West (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Metra lines/branches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Metra color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Metra style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Metra lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Metra stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Cms (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Metra and Module:Adjacent stations/Chicago and North Western Railway. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete - as per nom and all previous S-link TfD results. A shame T3 doesn't address this as it could save all of our time. --Gonnym (talk) 09:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox reality competition season. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Infobox television season/custom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox reality competition season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox television season/custom with Template:Infobox reality competition season.
These two templates handle overlapping subjects - TV seasons of reality competition shows. |host=, |num_contestants=, |locations= and |winner= have corresponding parameters in ((Infobox reality competition season)); |judges= and |num_tasks= should be added; |tour_exemptions= and |tournament_exemptions= should be removed as none of the other shows list their prizes - and in this case, the prizes are understandable by a very limited group of people who understand golf terminology and is not something that should be placed in a summary infobox; |all_stars_link= and |all_stars= should be removed as it is used to for individuals who appeared again in other seasons, but that has nothing to do with a summary infobox of the current season and should be covered in the article itself. Gonnym (talk) 23:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't see this as controversial at all. As I've stated elsewhere, I created ((Infobox television season/custom)) while merging several other low-use forks of ((Infobox television season)) into that template and didn't seek consensus to remove any of the fields that shouldn't be in Infobox television season. I'd be happy to see Infobox television season/custom deleted altogether but if we have to keep the fields then I support the merge proposal. --AussieLegend (✉) 05:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Merge as per nom as Template:Infobox television season/custom actually overlaps with both Template:Infobox reality competition season and Template:Infobox reality talent competition. I would actually like to propose a different solution.

• For shows like America's Next Top Model, Project Runway, Shear Genius, Food Network Star and Top Chef they can be switched over to Template:Infobox reality talent competition since it already has |judges= the only change that would be needed is adding |num_tasks= to the template for the shows that use it. RuPaul's Drag Race is similar to the other fashion reality shows use and it already uses Template:Infobox reality talent competition which looks good in those articles.
• The Big Break and The Apprentice (franchise) can be migrated over to Template:Infobox reality competition season with only the |teams= needing to be added.

This proposal would effectively reduce the number of reality TV show templates down to 2 and keep the unique fields and layout of Template:Infobox reality talent competition which can't be replicated in the module. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 18:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• I don't mind your split (full disclosure though, I'll probably one day nominate ((Infobox reality talent competition)) once I figure out how best to deal with it). I do oppose |teams= as that is a meaningless trivia parameter. In the context of the article it can be explained who was part of the team, but in an infobox there is no context so all you are left with is just a name. --Gonnym (talk) 10:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:09, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Called (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned maintenance template (I replaced its single transclusion) redundant to ((Who)) (for people) and ((Which)) (for other things) – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. ((3x|p))ery (talk) 23:36, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:09, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Jubilee Medal "XX Years of the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army" (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Jubilee Medal "70 Years of Victory in the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945" (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Jubilee Medal "65 Years of Victory in the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945" (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused templates that are just an image. If needed can be placed directly in article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete - replaced by File:20 years saf rib.png, File:65 years.png and File:70thmedalribbon.png. Note that other templates in Category:Soviet military decorations and medals templates are also unused other than in draft userspaces and have similar file replacements. --Gonnym (talk) 11:17, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:10, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Backlog progress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was nominated in 2011 and the result was "short term keep" along with If you want to have it kept for longer, please give it some documentation of both how to use it and its intended uses.. That has not happened. Still unused. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete even if it were used, it's just simple text with no reason to be in a template. ((3x|p))ery (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per Pppery and nom,--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete I don't remember but I guess I made this, it should be safe to nuke at this time. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 03:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• I see now, I intended to delete this after a backlog was cleared out for the contribution team, and never got around to doing it. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 03:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Azido (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused symbol template Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:CD_Palestino_squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:13, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Philippine film festivals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. just a category Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep and use potentially useful. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep - cleaned the navbox from redirects and category link and added it to festival pages. --Gonnym (talk) 11:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:13, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Philippine National Railways stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete another tmeplate already in use. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Philippine Dioceses (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete another template already in use. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Pet food brands (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Pilgrimage sites in India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete not in use, and too many potential pilgramage sites to be usefully listed on a template. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Platysternidae (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that is too convoluted to be useful. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete there is only one species in the family Platysternidae. Navbox for the family is pointless. Plantdrew (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Playboy playmate templates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete another tmeplate already in use. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Poland Squad 2007 Women’s European Volleyball Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:40, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete does not provide useful navigational value, , should not be included on linked articles as a navboxand unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Poland squad 2015 FIVB Men's World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:40, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete does not provide useful navigational value, , should not be included on linked articles as a navboxand unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Polimer TV shows (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:40, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete - this is even worse than the other TV nav template. These TV shows are not even original productions by that channel. --Gonnym (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Polish_Radio_Stations_before_WW2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Politics of Arizona (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused sidebar template Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:40, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Pollachi–Dindigul branch line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused diagram Diagram is now used once, on one page. Should simply be substituted onto the page and the template deleted. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep: no longer unused. (Inserted into a suitable parent article.) Useddenim (talk) 23:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • @Useddenim: since you have now inserted it onto a single page, any reason not to just subst the text? it is only used on ONE page. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Zackmann08: Don't you even follow your own TfD nominations?!? See this for why we keep RDTs separate. Useddenim (talk) 22:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Useddenim: There are about 500 tfds I'm currently managing. Sorry I didn't connect this one to that one. Regardless I still don't agree with your assessment. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

But Tom (LT), Pi.1415926535, Thryduulf & Kusma do. Useddenim (talk) 23:32, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep per the reasons expressed in various other TfDs (including the one linked above) why RDTs are best kept as templates. Thryduulf (talk) 23:35, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep like all other railway diagram templates. —Kusma (t·c) 06:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Pomona Valley (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Ponce TV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Popular articles/more (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that has been replace on parent page Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Porsche Carrera Cup Italy circuits (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Porsche Carrera Cup Great Britain circuits (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Porsche Carrera Cup Australia circuits (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. The template is unused contrary to GiantSnowman's claim. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Port Vila Premier League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep - it is not unused as nom falsely claims, and serves a useful purpose. GiantSnowman 13:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Could you point to where it is used? I cannot see it being used anywhere either. --Gonnym (talk) 17:48, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • @GiantSnowman: care to backup your accusation? Because Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Port_Vila_Premier_League pretty clearly shows that it is unused... --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Portuguese India Armadas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Portuguese Liga Breakthrough Player of the Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:36, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• • Article has a full list of players, so seems like a good navbox (similar to other awards). Might be a project-related issue why this type of navbox was not used on articles. If this isn't going to be used then delete. --Gonnym (talk) 22:09, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Portuguese_Radio_Stations_in_Massachusetts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Protected areas in Negros (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Now used (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Steelers1959DraftPicks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with very few navigational links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:34, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Oppose the navbox is used on nine pages including J. W. Brodnax, Riley Gunnels, Tom Barnett (American football), among others.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 14:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Oppose. Navbox is now fully used. As far as this entire class of navboxes as a concept, a broader discussion would have to take place at WT:NFL before we should be taking any action there. Additionally, any WP:ACCESS concerns that may exist here actually involve a different template, not this one. Ejgreen77 (talk) 16:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Now used (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Steelers1958DraftPicks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with very few navigational links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:34, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Oppose used on five pages.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 14:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Oppose. Navbox is now fully used. As far as this entire class of navboxes as a concept, a broader discussion would have to take place at WT:NFL before we should be taking any action there. Additionally, any WP:ACCESS concerns that may exist here actually involve a different template, not this one. Ejgreen77 (talk) 16:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Now used. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Steelers1952DraftPicks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with very few navigational links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:34, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. Unused and not a navbox that should be.--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Oppose is used on the bulk of NFL draftees pages. This one is currently linked to several players [1].-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Oppose. Navbox is now fully used. As far as this entire class of navboxes as a concept, a broader discussion would have to take place at WT:NFL before we should be taking any action there. Additionally, any WP:ACCESS concerns that may exist here actually involve a different template, not this one. Ejgreen77 (talk) 16:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Now used (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Steelers1949DraftPicks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with very few navigational links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:34, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. Unused and not a navbox that should be.--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Oppose is used on the bulk of NFL draftees pages. This one is currently linked to several players [2].-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Oppose. Navbox is now fully used. As far as this entire class of navboxes as a concept, a broader discussion would have to take place at WT:NFL before we should be taking any action there. Additionally, any WP:ACCESS concerns that may exist here actually involve a different template, not this one. Ejgreen77 (talk) 16:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Now used (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Steelers1947DraftPicks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with very few navigational links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. Unused and not a navbox that should be.--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Oppose is used on the bulk of NFL draftees pages. This one is currently linked to several players [3].-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 15:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Oppose. Navbox is now fully used. As far as this entire class of navboxes as a concept, a broader discussion would have to take place at WT:NFL before we should be taking any action there. Additionally, any WP:ACCESS concerns that may exist here actually involve a different template, not this one. Ejgreen77 (talk) 16:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Steelers1946DraftPicks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:25, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Qwest (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Quick access links (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Queensland road routes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Quebec Student Sports Federation soccer venues (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:27, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:QSR Restaurants (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with ZERO links. Not serving any navigation purpose Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete - not a nav template. --Gonnym (talk) 22:15, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:QMJHL_trophies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:QAFLclubs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete - seems to have been replaced by Template:NEAFL. --Gonnym (talk) 22:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Provincial capitals cities of La Libertad Region (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Provincial Ridings in Greater Toronto (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete. There's never actually been a consensus to split Ontario's provincial electoral districts into different regions which would each have their own region-specific navboxes in lieu of a single provincewide template — so this is redundant to ((ON-ED)). Which also explains why it's very, very outdated: in 2019, those party standings are hilarious. Bearcat (talk) 01:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Progresso Associação do Sambizanga (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete - unused, but even if it were, it barely has 3-4 links. --Gonnym (talk) 22:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Princes of Lorraine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Power Companies of India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with only 4 links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. No in use (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:58, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Power stations in Turkey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep Missing references to the template were established now. The reason for deletion is no more existent. CeeGee 09:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:RPC Chile (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that is too large to be useful. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Railpower locomotives (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:09, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Railway_stations_in_Nagaland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Redrose64 has added it to articles so no reason to delete it anymore. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Railway stations in Nottinghamshire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Use I don't know why this template is not used, but it's part of a set - pretty much every other county has a navbox (see Category:Rail transport navigational boxes of England. I have a recollection that there was a discussion about these navboxes/categories a year or so back with consensus to include them, although I can't immediately find it. Thryduulf (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep I used it despite some interference. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Now widely used thanks to Thryduulf! No reason to delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Railway stations in the Borough of Scarborough (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep and use - I can't explain why it's disused at present, but it seems a very useful navbox that complements Template:Railway stations in North Yorkshire as the latter includes only open National Rail stations but this template also includes closed stations and those on heritage railways. Thryduulf (talk) 13:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep and use - I did not know it existed but it should be uploaded to all the stations that it pertains to (in a collapsed format) so that it aids comprehensive navigation. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 17:39, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• No longer unused Given The joy of all things's comment and the lack of any objections, I've added it to all the articles it lists. Someone who cares about template placement though may wish to take a look at the articles as they were inconsistent with their placement of navigation templates with respect to references, external links and further reading sections. Thryduulf (talk) 17:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Rajasthan Royals 2008 IPL Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Now in use. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Rakaia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep as it looks useful to me. The "longest rivers" class should be removed as it's irrelevant but otherwise it's a normal "river template". I'd be happy to add it to the relevant pages if the decision is to keep the template. Schwede66 19:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep. Perfectly standard (and useful) river navbox. Why it's unused is a mystery - one about to be corrected. Grutness...wha? 01:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Rally Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Now in use. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Rangitata (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no clear criteria for inclusion Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep as it looks useful to me. The "longest rivers" class should be removed as it's irrelevant but otherwise it's a normal "river template". I'd be happy to add it to the relevant pages if the decision is to keep the template. Schwede66 19:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep. Perfectly standard (and useful) river navbox. Why it's unused is a mystery - one about to be corrected. Grutness...wha? 01:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Rashid Latif Medical Complex (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Regional Preferente de La Rioja (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete - not useful. GiantSnowman 13:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Regions of Republika Srpska (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:35, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Republicanism in Egypt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused sidebar template Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:16, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:35, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Reykjavik City municipal election, 2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused election result template. Information already present on the article in question. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:16, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:35, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Rio Grande Valley (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:16, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Rio de Janeiro bid schedule for the 2016 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused schedule template Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Roads in Latvia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Roads in Brunei (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Roads in Asia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Rock Radio Stations in Arkansas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Renaming should follow the usual process. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Roman Catholic Church in Scotland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Should it not be connected to the page Catholic Church in Scotland? Mark Hamid (talk) 11:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

keep, now used in its clearly existent parent article. —Kusma (t·c) 11:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep and rename back to Template:Catholic Church in Scotland (was moved 2016 by Benkenobi18) in accordance with main article Catholic Church in Scotland, as further emphasised by Talk:Catholic Church in Scotland. There is no reason the immediate template title should deviate. PPEMES (talk) 20:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Ross Pictish Stones (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete - not needed as all it does is duplicate the content of a larger template "Pictish sculptured stones", which is used on almost all the articles that this template links to. EdwardUK (talk) 09:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Royal Governors of New Jersey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Rugby league concepts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:46, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Rugby union chronology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:47, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Russian aeroengine manufacturers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:47, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:S.L. Benfica (Luanda) Football (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no actual content Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:48, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:SJFA_West_Division_One (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:48, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:SKY law schools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with only 2 links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:48, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Sabado Star Power sa Gabi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Sabah political parties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Salt Lake City sites (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 19. Primefac (talk) 19:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Samanid_Provinces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:40, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Sampaio Corrêa Futebol Clube squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete - serves no useful purpose. GiantSnowman 13:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:San Mig Coffee Mixers 2013–14 PBA Philippine Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:San Mig Coffee Mixers 2014 PBA Governors' Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Sangam period (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Santa Catarina Municipalities Serrana (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:53, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Santiago, Dom Rep TV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:42, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Sciences Po (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete, apparently it has never been used. Also, it is in French. The French Wikipedia does not have an equivalent template either. —Kusma (t·c) 10:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:53, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Scottish Trades Union Congress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:09, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:53, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Scottish criminal justice system (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:54, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Sediment_transport (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:43, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Seismic faults of South America (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused template with no parent article Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:07, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete - per nom. Unused since 2010. Nigej (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).