Module:Sources
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Taxonomy/Strobus
Template:US Census 1790
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template linking to original research created by new user still learning the ropes. Links to author's website (I guess) by the username. Awesome Aasim 06:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unnecessary template that currently only links to a part of the census containing 12 names. Other citations to the census would probably need to fill out enough of the fields of ((cite census)) that this template wouldn't save much work if it were generalized. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- delete we don't need a template to link to one specific web page, even if it was an official census page. And as per WP:ELNO a link to a personal cite where someone has posted a scan of a census record is not useful at all. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).