The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Rayment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Rayment-pc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Rayment-hc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Rayment's website is a self-published source. There's no evidence it meets WP:RS, and these templates are being used (in some cases deceptively) to link to bare lists of names that we'd probably delete here as redundant to categories. The templates serve to perpetuate links to an unreliable source. Guy (help!) 22:46, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep all The reliability of these has been discussed before, for example at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage/Archive 10#Leigh Rayment's Peerage Pages and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage/Archive 11#Leigh Rayment's Peerage Pages (2017). ((Rayment)) was also kept at a previous TfD, something that was not mentioned by the nominator. Also, only one of the three templates has been tagged. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The site is a remarkable work of research and no more "self-published" than Wikipedia is.The originator has died and the site is now hijacked by a pill-vendor but its laudable content is still available via the Wayback Machine.12.144.5.2 (talk) 01:45, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all Per Redrose64, but I might like to see the template pointing to the archive.org rather than site ... might need fuzzy date matching for dates before 2016 or something (I don't know what I am talking about). Using as my example Jonathan Pim (1806–1885) the target I'm looking for is Dublin on ... [1] ... unfortunately the article is set to use: Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs which is too broad while Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "D" (part 3) barf's with a 404. So if th template cannot be improved it may need to ditched and static links to Wayback used instead .... 'tis a project but ye shouldn't be undoing man years of work with panic ... delete.Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all as Rayment's work was rather useful. Schwede66 23:50, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:The Atheist Barnstar. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Wp atheism barnstar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I think this Barnstar has only been awarded twice since the template was created in 2008. Furthermore, the Barnstar image is outdated with its JPEG file and poor quality. But the Barnstar is being replaced with Template:The Atheist Barnstar per discussion JudeccaXIII (talk) 20:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per my reasoning at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 September 9#Template:The LGBT studies Barnstar. --Trialpears (talk) 21:35, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 September 18. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:AWBBot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PATH infobox header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/PATH anyway which delivers a different styling (see also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 9#PATH s-line templates). Mackensen (talk) 11:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. This template's functionality is available in a better template/module. BLAIXX 16:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PAT infobox header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; the capability exists within Module:Adjacent stations/PAAC anyway (see also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 January 24#Port Authority of Allegheny County S-line templates). In addition, the Port Authority has moved away from that style of branding. Mackensen (talk) 11:19, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom (also it's not great looking). --Trialpears (talk) 07:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Reba cast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Cast members should not be included in television and/or film navigational templates and this is the only television navigational template I have found on Wikipedia that does. If you take away the cast links, the only article left is the television show. With no notable character or episode articles, the navigational template would navigate nowhere. Aspects (talk) 06:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Trialpears (talk) 07:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WikiProject Education in Nepal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not required as a parameter for education is already included under Template:WikiProject_Nepal. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 04:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]
I am also nominating the following related template because they are obsolete and Template:WikiProject_Nepal with param as education can be used instead:

Template:WikiProject Education of Nepal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

• Delete both. The first is used on just three pages and is easily replaceable per nom, the second is unused and can't seem to decide if it's for "education" or "geography". PC78 (talk) 18:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both These seem to be part of an attempt by Amrit Ghimire Ranjit (talk · contribs) (who is nowadays barely active) to create a new WikiProject, one which does not seem to have been proposed at WP:COUNCIL (who would have offered assistance had it been sought). The "in" one predates the "of" one by about ten hours. There are various possible explanations for the existence of two: (a) the original name was wrong; (b) the original name was forgotten; (c) lack of experience - they had only made fifteen previous edits in Template: space, the majority of which were to userboxes. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).