- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. I checked for missing transclusions and see none of interest. Izno (talk) 23:15, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Someone unified the result pages at Template:Football results CONCACAF, so these nominated templates are redundant to the new one. Also notifying template creators @Jaime070996: @Madr1000: -- AquaDTRS (talk) 21:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Transclusions of new template already as expected. Izno (talk) 23:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
redundant to Template:Football results CAF -- AquaDTRS (talk) 21:03, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Thailand NFT results needs to be replaced. Izno (talk) 23:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Someone did a good job combining all the results into one unified template at Template:Football results AFC, so these nominated templates are redundant to the new one.-- AquaDTRS (talk) 20:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Druryfire: notifying template creator -- AquaDTRS (talk) 21:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Singapore NFT results
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
redundant to Template:Football results AFC. also, does this count as WP:T3? -- AquaDTRS (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, does not need separate template. GiantSnowman 11:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Talk addOnloadHook
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Can easily be recreated if necessary. Izno (talk) 23:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, seems not very useful (anymore). TheImaCow (talk) 17:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- AquaDTRS (talk) 22:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was redirect to Wikipedia:Teahouse/Header. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 18:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if this is a T3 so.. currently unused, the current, used banner is at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Header. TheImaCow (talk) 17:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this should probably be redirected. --Izno (talk) 01:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 6. Izno (talk) 14:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Subsidiaries and branches of RDFZ
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:REFUND to user space if requested. Izno (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Contains only one blue link. TheImaCow (talk) 09:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No objection. Though it might be worthwhile to backup the template somewhere in case those articles are created later.Foreverj2222 (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Subs:pr
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 6. Izno (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, contains only red links. TheImaCow (talk) 09:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:31, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 6. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Speedway Grand Prix of Norway
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Contains only red links. TheImaCow (talk) 07:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: nothing has been done with this since 2009. It is unlikely to happen any time soon even though a Polish version exists and its contents have not been updated since 2007. ww2censor (talk) 10:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Spanish Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. TheImaCow (talk) 07:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Spamme
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, seems not very useful (anymore). TheImaCow (talk) 07:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't remember why I created this, a few other people I checked with don't remember. Maybe some deleted page references it? Anyways, feel free to delete. Legoktm (talk) 01:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).