Template:AS Saint-Étienne (women) squad
Only 1 player in this squad has an article, so template fails basic purpose as a navigation tool. The team is in Division 2, so unlikely any of their players would meet WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG currently Joseph2302 (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:ASPTT Albi squad
No need for this template, as only 2 links. Most of the players won't be notable, as the club is in the 2nd tier of football, and so players don't meet WP:NFOOTY. As such, this template doesn't help any navigation between articles, and so is redundant Joseph2302 (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you saying the article and template needs to be updated so that women are better represented on Wikipedia? If so, I totally agree. Hmlarson (talk) 15:32, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I mean because otherwise, "Most of the players won't be notable, as the club is in the 2nd tier of football, and so players don't meet WP:NFOOTY." is a WP:TROLL maneuver rooted in some male? editors' insecurities. This team played in Division 1 Feminine per the article and we all know WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY. Hmlarson (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I think we should improve women's articles on Wikipedia. However, I'm saying that most Division 2 Féminine players won't meet our notability standards (WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTY), and so we'll never get enough links to make it a worthwhile template whilst they're in D2. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:36, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template no longer works. The contents get populated automatically from Wikidata, but the links they provide are no longer valid. I raised this at the template talk page a few weeks ago, but no reaction so far. Template should either be deleted, or hidden until the problem is fixed at the Wikidata side. It is used on some 300+ pages, some of them high profile ones like Auguste Rodin. Fram (talk) 10:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes I saw that already. Such a shame! It appears the website still exists, but apparently they gave all artists new identifiers, so it's not a question of just fixing a formatter url due to new website hosting. I think it's best to hide the template until someone can find a way to update the links. I don't see an easy fix. Jane (talk) 15:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Fram, I changed the url to use the archive of the site until the website is fixed. Frietjes (talk) 17:42, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, I'll leave this open to hear more opinions and options (if any), but this seems like a good solution in any case. Fram (talk) 07:32, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]