< February 19 February 21 >

February 20

Template:Infobox ride

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Discospinster with the reason "unnecessary and unused infobox" FASTILY 23:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox new

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Discospinster with the reason "unnecessary and unused infobox" FASTILY 23:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ice hockey penalties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the links on this template go to a specific section of one page (Penalty (ice hockey)), which is not what a navbox is supposed to do. Either this navbox should be deleted or the links should be cut down so that it only contains links to relevant pages on ice hockey penalties (e.g. not just kick). P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Juicy ML

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created by banned user IWasMadeWalker as undisclosed paid editing (later disclosed here) for a promotional page which is currently at AfD here with seven unanimous delete !votes. This nearly deleted article is the only use of this template for a non-notable musician. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 21:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Injangyang Township

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of red links with no reasonable chance of ever becoming an article. Bot created. Why the whole category can not be deleted is a mystery to me, so I follow the advice of Plasticpork and nominate them separately. The Banner talk 11:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

User:Melab-1/Userboxes/Basic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Template does not exist. If the title linked contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT 12:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

G1 and G2 WP:CSD Huggums537 (talk) 11:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Archive bottom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Archive bottom per the previous discussion. Izno (talk) 01:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Archive bottom with Template:Discussion bottom.
See this discussion from last year.

Eventually, I will nominate some more templates, but I am in no rush. ((Discussion bottom)) and ((Archive bottom)) are rather high profile, so they can easily be discussed separately. –MJLTalk 03:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IK Frej squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 18:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Club has dropped down to the Swedish sixth tier. No squad list on their website, far below the professional level, not even the manager has a Wiki article. Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 03:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cmd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in article space and only one transclusion in project space. JsfasdF252 (talk) 01:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).