Template:Strloc insert
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Only used in a few sandboxes. Was used on one article and its talk page but not in a way I thought was useful. New code doing very fiddly work with strings is likely to be written in Lua directly; clearly this function is rarely if ever needed. User:GKFXtalk 20:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, better to code this in lua directly if it is ever needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Unused adjacent stations modules
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:44, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, if needed, can be recreated. Frietjes (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Annum
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Barely used; according to documentation its purpose is to apply a certain styling, but it doesn't, and that styling would in any case be contrary to MOS:DATE. Hairy Dude (talk) 16:58, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Little used. Not sure small text for the AD/BC/etc is the approved style anyway (see MOS:ERA). Nigej (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- delete after replacement per MOS:DATE. Frietjes (talk) 15:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:The Boyz
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 14:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Only three actual articles here, and one of those is a member's article. Doesn't need a navbox yet. Ss112 02:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, the articles are already well-connected through the infobox succession links, prose, etc. Frietjes (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).